|
Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,726
|
![]()
AAV-7A1
CH-53 UH-1N AV-8 Harrier II M240G Mk19 And if possible, would it be possible to have certain maps where special operations units would be able to fight (Force Recon, Detachment One, SAS) |
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case." - Abraham Lincoln "i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;" - Garabaldi
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,208
Location: "destruction of WEYBRIDGE and Shepperton"
|
![]()
i like the idea of specialsit teams on certain maps but that is fialry compicated in terms of new guns adn class's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,726
|
![]()
Yeah, but the LAV-25 is overused in ATM, the AAV-7A1 is actually meant to transport alot of troops. The CH-53 is used more often than a damn Seahawk for helo transportion. They also need a attack jet (AV-
![]() |
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case." - Abraham Lincoln "i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;" - Garabaldi
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 625
Location: C A N A D A
|
![]() Quote:
| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
|
![]()
Cerberus: i thought the F-35 fills the role as the attack jet for the USMC???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() |
![]()
AAV-7A1
CH-53 UH-1N AV-8 Harrier II M240G Mk19 Theyve already confirmed the CH-53 will be in, the Harrier and M240 have already been modeled an skinned both are in media section (harrier might need a new skin but thats about it), AAV7 an Huey would be nice, i think well see the Huey eventually not sure about the Amtrac |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 814
Location: Florida
|
![]()
Lets add some AirForce vehicles as well
![]() likk ohhhh i dont know... the F-16 maybe ![]() Quote:
| |
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,726
|
![]()
The AAV-7A1 can carry alot more troops than an LAV-25, which is more like a scout vehicle.
And I was browsing through the media earlier today and saw the model for the MH-53 |
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case." - Abraham Lincoln "i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;" - Garabaldi
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 625
Location: C A N A D A
|
![]()
I think the AT-4 should be implimented.
Shoud be bit stronger than an grenade, used for anti-infantry/light vehicles. Give it to assult? Also the A-10 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
equipment, usmc, vehicles |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|