project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Suggestions
26 May 2018, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.

View Poll Results: QCB/middle range or Longrange maps
QCB 73 13.59%
Longrange 54 10.06%
A mix of all 363 67.60%
Middle Range 47 8.75%
Voters: 537. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2008, 04:18 PM   #1

arjan's Avatar
Default Poll: Should PR get more focused on CQB and middle range battles or long range

Should PR get more focused on QCB/Middle range combat like 0.5

Or should PR leave it this way and get more big maps for combined arms like 0.7 now

Or a mix

I choose for the focused QCB/middle range combat maps, becouse it was much more fun in 0,5 to play and big maps call for lonewolfers and are barely teamplayed
arjan is offline
Last edited by arjan; 03-07-2008 at 09:46 AM..
Old 03-06-2008, 04:28 PM   #2

all, in the same map.
Jonny is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 04:41 PM   #3

Ghost1800's Avatar

I think it's really up to the mappers to decide what they want to focus on. As for me, I love it when there are several different environments in the same map.
Ghost1800 is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 05:05 PM   #4

Originally Posted by Jonny View Post
all, in the same map.
Absolutely. Its a sucky map other wise. Spot and mark targets a long range, call in air support if you want, suppress at medium range and close for some serious hardcore nade spamage cos its realistic and only way to do it MATE!!!

P.s i cant spoil my vote so i just wont vote, lol
Top_Cat_AxJnAt is offline
Last edited by Top_Cat_AxJnAt; 03-06-2008 at 05:30 PM..
Old 03-06-2008, 05:11 PM   #5
Supporting Member

RCMoonPie's Avatar

What about the option for keeping it the same and having PR encompass all types of fighting?
Great poll with only two options....both of which would suck alone.

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
RCMoonPie is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 05:42 PM   #6

Where is the third option?

"all kind of ranges"

Do not post stupid suggestions just because you had a bad round in PR
Ragni<RangersPL> is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 06:23 PM   #7
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar

PR should present realistic battlefields, so if you have to get an objective using CQB that is how the cookie crumbles, if yo have to get an objective using long range engagement, same cookie different crumble.

Rudd is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 06:28 PM   #8

Cant wait for these 100% urban maps without all the tanks/jets being made. Finally some nice CQC ^^
NickO is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 07:01 PM   #9

mix of both, keep the long range units to their own territorys, like tanks and snipers, and in urban and closed woodland environments stack some statics for cover to impliment close quarters fights.
Psyko is offline
Old 03-06-2008, 07:27 PM   #10
Retired PR Developer

Bob_Marley's Avatar

I'd definetly like more dense terrain maps (Urban/Jungle/Forest/etc), as I'm fed up of staring over great featureless plains.

Not that great, featureless plains are all bad, they just crop up a bit too often for my liking.

The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.

Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Bob_Marley is offline
Closed Thread

battles, cqb, focused, long, middle, poll, range
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2018, Project Reality