Update: Project Reality: BF2 v1.4 Announced!

[LordHenryWotton]

Fantastic work!

[Rabbit]

Originally Posted by Oskar

Does this mean I get to play PR with Mineral soon again, finally?

Devs dont play.

[X-Alt]

Originally Posted by Aleksa2000SM

T-72B hase better armour and optic(not really imporetent for game) and ATGM i think

T-72S were basically the same save for the number of ERA blocks. The Russians use a lot of those, that were originally intended for service in Saddam's army.

[altfuture]

Thank you devs, you guys are amazing!!

[[R-DEV]Mineral]

Originally Posted by Oskar

Does this mean I get to play PR with Mineral soon again, finally?

Until v1.5 starts development

[[R-DEV]​Rhino]

Originally Posted by Rabbit

RIP in peace.

Frigate is a lie.

[przekolorowany]

Originally Posted by [R-CON]rPoXoTauJIo

Pilots will need to re-attend flight school through

Finally, thank you

[CG-Delta]

Awesome. I'm happy that you stuck with the armour decisions you displayed from the previous highlight and didn't succumb to the negative feedback. I'm all for this. I don't like the idea that one can take any cheap crap vehicle and simply buy a modern ATGM weapon system to put on top, and suddenly will this vehicle and a main battle tank be equal opponents.
Will you please give a few words about angle of hit. Example: 'You are about to shoot an armoured vehicle facing front towards you. The side is ever so slightly visible and just possible to hit. Will you go for the side (weaker armour) or will you hit the front because the angle of hit (from side) will be shit for any HEAT system. Probably AP as well.'
I seems like angle of hit is already a factor in the game but I'm not sure.

[MisTyK]

CAN'T WAIT !!!!

Great JOB

[obpmgmua]

Thank god the falklands are back. L1A1 SLR + SUIT was my jam back in the day. Full Auto Fal = Waste of Bullets!