project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Feedback
20 Apr 2019, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Developer Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 Feedback Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer).

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2018-12-27, 13:53   #231
InfantryGamer42
Default Re: TOW damage to front armor

If we go this way, for Abrams we would need at least 5 materials:
1st Material is for front of turret that IRL provides biggest protection against both ATGM and APFSDS.
My suggestion would be that current damage model stayes for this one.
2nd Material is for top glacis. This glacis is angled at extreme angle so HEAT shells and ATGM will bounce IRL. But, top glacis doesnt offer any protection against APFSDS. So damage done by HEAT and ATGM would stay as it is, but APFSDS damage would be buffed to around 50%.
3nd Material is for lower glacis. This has composite armor, but it doesnt offer protection as turrent front armor. Damage done by APFSDS, HEAT and ATGM would be buffed to around 50%. My suggestion would be to also use this material for side armor of turret.
4th Material is for side armour of hull. It would stay same as it is.
5th Materila is for back and top armour. It would stay same as it is.

Prons of this system:
*Its solid buff for ATGM, because they would have ability to 2 shot damage tank from front.
*HEAT based AT weapons will also get buff in form of ability to 2 shot damage tank from front.
*APFSDS gets buffed now having ability to 2 shot tank.
Cons of this system:
*It will instigate more camping mentality, specially hull down gameplay

Note that for Russian and Chinese tanks system will be similar. Only difference would be rotation of 2nd and 3rd material on front of this tanks.
Note 2 I really dont know armor profile of Challenger 2, Leopard, Leclerc so if somebody can post some informations about those tanks it would be greatly appreciated.
InfantryGamer42 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-03, 20:24   #232
Heavy Death

Heavy Death's Avatar
Default Re: TOW damage to front armor

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfantryGamer42 View Post
Cons of this system:
*It will instigate more camping mentality, specially hull down gameplay
Yeah, god forbid realism in this game.

Heavy Death is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-10, 13:10   #233
Fuller
Default Re: TOW damage to front armor

The problem is that realism in games is unrealistic

I'd also like to see a slight damage buff for TOWs.(2 shot front, 1 shot side/rear)
Tanks are currently the most OP vehicles in game because there is no real counter anymore (broken CAS, nerfed TOW, increased number of tanks (e.g Kashan)).

Fuller is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-10, 17:05   #234
Menuen
Default Re: TOW damage to front armor

Fuller tank numbers were decreased from 8 to 4 or 3 . But everything else you said is true. TOW should deal 45% DMG to front armour. Now it's like oh there is a tow on the hill, let's rush it and rape INF at FOB.
Menuen is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
armor, atgm, damage, front, front armor, poxo is ghey, tow, tow damage
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31.