project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > News / Announcements > Project Reality News
17 Jul 2018, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Project Reality News Project Reality news releases and announcements.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2018, 02:52 PM   #51
Long.Dong.Dave
Default Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

I think the equipment should be changed just a little bit:

-I think the STG44 should be like an Elite Rifleman kit or something that you get from a crate

-Pointmen should have SMGs, w/alts as rifles. I think max 2 SMGs per squad is an acceptable amount for WW2.

-German Army MG should just be the MG34 w/no alt. Or the Alt should be MG30(t) or a drum fed MG42 (shorter clip than MMG version)

-German Para MG should have MG34 w/ alt being the FG42.

-German Para SL should have MP40 w/ alt G43

-Idk if the US LAT kit has a bazooka from the image, but I think they should have AT grenades instead and the Bazooka reserved for the HAT kit

Thats my two cents on the kits
Long.Dong.Dave is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 02:12 AM   #52
HeneraLuna
Default Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Quote:
Originally Posted by Long.Dong.Dave View Post
I think the equipment should be changed just a little bit:

-I think the STG44 should be like an Elite Rifleman kit or something that you get from a crate

-Pointmen should have SMGs, w/alts as rifles. I think max 2 SMGs per squad is an acceptable amount for WW2.

-German Army MG should just be the MG34 w/no alt. Or the Alt should be MG30(t) or a drum fed MG42 (shorter clip than MMG version)

-German Para MG should have MG34 w/ alt being the FG42.

-German Para SL should have MP40 w/ alt G43

-Idk if the US LAT kit has a bazooka from the image, but I think they should have AT grenades instead and the Bazooka reserved for the HAT kit

Thats my two cents on the kits
did US used anti tank grenades?, maybe we can use sticky bombs.

HeneraLuna is online now Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 07:57 AM   #53
agus92
Default Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeneraLuna View Post
did US used anti tank grenades?, maybe we can use sticky bombs.
No sticky nades. AT were just from GL, afaik.

agus92 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 10:01 AM   #54
Rammen4
Default Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Yo, Taylor, I'm really happy for you, I'ma let you finish, but Post Scriptum had one of the best videos of all time! One of the best videos of all time!

(And it's right round the corner)
Rammen4 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 12:49 PM   #55
Long.Dong.Dave
Default Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Quote:
Originally Posted by agus92 View Post
No sticky nades. AT were just from GL, afaik.

The US paras def used Gammon Bombs in Normandy. The problem that I see with US AT is that there really was no squad AT weapon. There was usually one two-man bazooka team per platoon, but there could be more depending on allocations from the company command. I just feel if every US squad were to have a bazooka, they would have a significant AT advantage over the Germans, which historically should have the AT advantage cuz of panzerfausts.
Long.Dong.Dave is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
2018, june, prww2, status, update
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2018, Project Reality