project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Feedback > Maps
17 Jul 2019, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Developer Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2018-06-21, 14:19   #31
[R-DEV]​Outlawz7
PR:BF2 Developer

Outlawz7's Avatar
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by rPoXoTauJIo View Post
There's a reason why we split cas assets(helis and jets) on other maps such as kashan\khami, as helicopters unable to survive against jets on their own.
Meh, we still keep transport helis on jet layers.

Outlawz7 is online now Reply With Quote
Old 2018-06-21, 22:38   #32
FFG
PR Server License Moderator

FFG's Avatar
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

Hades peak has CAS heli + 2 seater for both teams.

FFG is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-10, 07:31   #33
solidfire93

solidfire93's Avatar
Smile Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

floating tree in Op.thunder !

https://prnt.sc/kgxgty

location :

https://prnt.sc/kgxii8
solidfire93 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-10, 16:24   #34
tankninja1

tankninja1's Avatar
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

One thing I have noticed is that the BWP-1s seem to only serve as cannon fodder and the only Polish APC that seems to be halfway useful is the Rosomak. Considering the Russians get 2 BMP-2s I think the balance would work out a lot better if it was 2 Rosomak's and 1 BWP-1.

Also why isn't the UKM-2000 the default AR option instead of the MG kit? The Polish don't seem to have a conventional AR in their army but in terms of balance I think the scoped UKM is much closer to what other factions use than a iron sights PKM. It would seem you could even swap the UKM into the AR kit slot then change the MG kit to the PKM as standard with the alt MG being the MG3.

tankninja1 is offline
Last edited by tankninja1; 2018-08-10 at 16:31..
Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-10, 17:51   #35
FFG
PR Server License Moderator

FFG's Avatar
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by tankninja1 View Post
One thing I have noticed is that the BWP-1s seem to only serve as cannon fodder and the only Polish APC that seems to be halfway useful is the Rosomak. Considering the Russians get 2 BMP-2s I think the balance would work out a lot better if it was 2 Rosomak's and 1 BWP-1.
Both the BWP ATGM and the HEAT shell will 1 shot the BMP-2. Where the Rosomak gets out DPS'd by the BMP-2. You'd have to be a pretty bad gunner to die to a Rosomak in a BMP-2.

FFG is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-10, 22:10   #36
tankninja1

tankninja1's Avatar
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by FFG View Post
Both the BWP ATGM and the HEAT shell will 1 shot the BMP-2. Where the Rosomak gets out DPS'd by the BMP-2. You'd have to be a pretty bad gunner to die to a Rosomak in a BMP-2.
The 30mm on the Rosomak was working like a charm. Maybe the changes to vehicles damage models changed that in the last day, but the better turret on the Rosomak makes a huge difference to me.

tankninja1 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-08, 20:37   #37
Singh408
Default Re: Operation Thunder Map Feedback

I think on Alt layout Ru side needs a hind with atgms(Hind p-f) instead. Pol side gets the hind with atgms to counter 3x tanks
Singh408 is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
feedback, map, operation, thunder
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 18:43.