We have insurgents from Sf can we have other factions also? - Page 3

Hfett · 11-22-2006, 11:47 PM

There are also a lot of Statics on SF that would be cool to have
Some statics got Elevators:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB52djqnBNg

Now some statics that would be good to have on some maps
Most of then would be great for Objectives Missions

Submarine Docks:

Cool statics

This one got an elevator:

I wonder if that vehicle does exist in real life?

and if it does wich country uses then on the army?

Nice carrier for Objetive Missons:

Apache Longbow

Hind MI-35 (russian)

A big static with an elevator also:

Another Humvee with Tow:

Another thing for new gametypes:

Jet Ski Are those used by the navy?

BrokenArrow · 11-23-2006, 12:16 AM

We don't want PR to be cool SF gadgets completely do we? I understand using a few of them but I'd like to see more original stuff than recycled EA stuff.

Duckitt · 11-23-2006, 02:52 AM

There are problems with getting the lightmaps for SF stuff AFAIK

ApatheticI · 11-23-2006, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [DVB] TRIggS

I would like to see the SEALS or Spetsnaz. I would also like to add to this.
SEALS-
Spec ops kit- Sig 551 Silenced P9 2 frags 2 slams NVG parachute etc.

Yes, a SG series of assault rifle indeed! Maybe a SG 552 though, since it's official name is "SG 552-2 SEAL"

Would be a nice addition IMO

I have alot more pics if you need them

$kelet0r · 11-23-2006, 05:29 AM

bring in the US Army I say and the Russians so that you can have an m4 and ak74 based factions respectively. It also means that the Apache gets a deserved place

On an off note - shouldn't the scar-l or scar-h replace the m4 for the US special forces for usmc?

[R-DEV]Bob_Marley · 11-23-2006, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApatheticI

Yes, a SG series of assault rifle indeed! Maybe a SG 552 though, since it's official name is "SG 552-2 SEAL"
<snip>
Would be a nice addition IMO

I have alot more pics if you need them

Ok, Tokyo Marui does not equal truth. AFAIK the SEALs dont use the 552, while it is pretty, its not all that realistic.

Quote:

On an off note - shouldn't the scar-l or scar-h replace the m4 for the US special forces for usmc?

Nope, the marine SF represented in PR dont fall under SOCOM, so they dont get SCARs

Anyway, I have to say I'd love to see Russian forces fighting against the chinese, but I'd love to see the Chinese, MEC, US and Brits sorted out first.

Oh yeah, say NO to ACU!

$kelet0r · 11-23-2006, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob_Marley

Nope, the marine SF represented in PR dont fall under SOCOM, so they dont get SCARs

Oh yeah, say NO to ACU!

Navy SEALs use the Scar-H and there is no reason why one could not have been assigned to a USMC squad as an advisor r- 7.62mm is a winner in CQC!

And say yes to ACU! - it looks cool

and if we get the Army we get the Bradley and the Apache and the M4 weapons family

Thunder · 11-23-2006, 06:29 AM

i wouldnt like to see the SAS or SEAL'S in a game, id rather see the larger more general Special Forces like the royal marine commandos, army rangers or british paracute regiment and so on, the forces used in the SF didnt really fit the maps it came with for example the navel base and carrier defence maps would more likely defended by the Marines or ship board personell, and the drug lord map assulted by royal marine commando units as it was a take and hold senario.

$kelet0r · 11-23-2006, 06:39 AM

agreed - tbh I'd prefer if the forces were kept as regular as possible to simulate modern warfare and avoid the counterstrike/infantry only route of special forces
PRM is a combined arms realism sim after all

Mekstizzle · 11-23-2006, 11:14 AM

Is it legal to steal stuff like this from SF?

11-22-2006, 11:47 PM	#21
Hfett PR Mapper Team Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,627 Location: Brazil	There are also a lot of Statics on SF that would be cool to have Some statics got Elevators: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB52djqnBNg Now some statics that would be good to have on some maps Most of then would be great for Objectives Missions Submarine Docks: Cool statics This one got an elevator: I wonder if that vehicle does exist in real life? and if it does wich country uses then on the army? Nice carrier for Objetive Missons: Apache Longbow Hind MI-35 (russian) A big static with an elevator also: Another Humvee with Tow: Another thing for new gametypes: Jet Ski Are those used by the navy?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-23-2006, 12:16 AM	#22
BrokenArrow Retired PR Developer Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 3,076 Location: NH, US	We don't want PR to be cool SF gadgets completely do we? I understand using a few of them but I'd like to see more original stuff than recycled EA stuff.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-23-2006, 02:52 AM	#23
Duckitt Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 192	There are problems with getting the lightmaps for SF stuff AFAIK
Duckitt Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 192

11-23-2006, 06:29 AM	#28
Thunder Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,034 Location: i dont know any more	i wouldnt like to see the SAS or SEAL'S in a game, id rather see the larger more general Special Forces like the royal marine commandos, army rangers or british paracute regiment and so on, the forces used in the SF didnt really fit the maps it came with for example the navel base and carrier defence maps would more likely defended by the Marines or ship board personell, and the drug lord map assulted by royal marine commando units as it was a take and hold senario.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-23-2006, 05:29 AM	#25
$kelet0r Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,405 Location: Dublin, Ireland	bring in the US Army I say and the Russians so that you can have an m4 and ak74 based factions respectively. It also means that the Apache gets a deserved place On an off note - shouldn't the scar-l or scar-h replace the m4 for the US special forces for usmc?

11-23-2006, 06:39 AM	#29
$kelet0r Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,405 Location: Dublin, Ireland	agreed - tbh I'd prefer if the forces were kept as regular as possible to simulate modern warfare and avoid the counterstrike/infantry only route of special forces PRM is a combined arms realism sim after all

11-23-2006, 11:14 AM	#30
Mekstizzle Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 882 Location: London, England	Is it legal to steal stuff like this from SF?

Sponsored Links