|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 805
|
Quote:
I heard that too but theres not really gunna fully replace anyone, because ur missing out on human intuition and just certain things that are unpredictablethat a machine couldn't be programmed to react quick enough to respond. So i doubt that they will ever be able to take over the AF | |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
|
My money on a human piloting a fighter vs. a fighter built around a computer would be on the silicon. Less problems with Gs mean tighter turns which leads to the computer getting behind the human.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: i dont know any more
Posts: 2,036
|
i heared to train these computer pilots they make them watch Topgun 16 hours a day!
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Support Technician
![]() |
Quote:
Of course if it was a remotely piloted drone, they might be more likely to risk bringing it home, rather than thinking of their own safety and ejecting. I'm sure our resident fighter-ace will discuss this with y-all | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 815
|
With drones, you don't have the sense of wether something is a target or not.
Example, intelligence says their is a insurgent weapons cache located at location X. Human pilot goes out there and realizes that there is a wedding going on at location X and aborts. A drone wouldn't differentiate and it would follow out its order, causing massive colleteral damage. [FONT=Verdana]They're good where para[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]m[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]eters for unknowns are li[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]m[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]ited, but [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]UAVs have proble[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]m[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]s in a fluid situation.[/FONT][FONT=Verdana] The trickle-down of infor[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]m[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]ation can be too slow to take advantage of rapidly changing events.[/FONT] And with Gecko1969 saying that drones can out fight human pilots, that is wrong, drones are still far off from dogfighting, but let me tell you something. During the Korean war, the maximum amount of Gs a human pilot could be expected to handle was around 5+, now human pilots can handle 8+. As technology is increased and the standard is raised, so too will the pilots. A counter-point could be made saying that drones erase the need for pilots to risk their lives. If that day ever comes, then war will turn into nothing but a video game, and countrys would be declaring war far more easily, as there is no risk to them. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NH, US
Posts: 3,076
|
I agree wholeheartedly with you on a human's ability to make clutch decisions better than a drone, but if someone is setting up to bomb a target (probably from thousands of feet in the air, right?) would they realistically be able to see the bride and groom tying the knot?
While I think it is a bad idea as of right now to replace human airedales with drones, I think the best way is to use them together. Drone goes in ahead of human pilot to scope the target, ensuring there is no wedding/party/field trip of school children, so that the human is safe to bomb away. But if it is just bombing, then two drones could do the same. Where humans have the advantage is in situations where they are being fired at and therefore can react to that. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 101
|
humans all the way tho i do think it is a damn shame to see them die tho...
to all the soliders, keep kicking ass and forget taking names,just kick their ass too! and thanks for all the freedom and stuff |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by 3cain3; 10-05-2006 at 11:28 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| drone, predator |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|