|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Community Factions Discussion on PR:BF2 community factions. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,135
|
I really don't see the point of all of this. One day it is ok to accept two new BLUFOR factions (if I'm not mistaken, they are BLUFOR) and one day after it isn't anymore?!
Also, you are saying "they can continue to develop their faction, but within the walls of the community modding section." What is the difference if they can do it within the walls of the PR Community Factions? You don't want BLUFOR factions anymore, well ok, but on the other hand we can continue to develop it, so why not doing it on a bigger place where we can receive more help? The whole idea is if you don't want a BLUFOR faction, then why letting us continue to develop it but not allowing us to get a subforum and get the faction within PR. This is incoherent or it's me who didn't understand... Is it because a subforum take too much place on the forum. Then I understand. I'm not a forum administrator and don't know how is it working. But if it is just because of the BLUFOR idea, then I don't see the point. It can't hurt to have a subforum for those who are developing a faction: they are just developing. Why one faction have the right to get a subforum and not the other? Because of the BLUFOR/OPFOR whole idea, something that much literal, it's just a concept. And one last point. Something about my Japanese faction and the Republic of China (Taiwanese) faction. You want more OPFOR faction, ok fine. But the Japanese and Taiwanese army have only 2 possible ennemies who could invade them: People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. That's make it 2 VS 2, pretty well-balanced no? We can not invent OPFOR factions... And I could make this statement about other factions as well. I am not asking for a subforum anymore as if we ever get one, I would feel I get it only because I groaned. And after that, failure from the said faction will not be accepted. I want the best for PR and getting a subforum this way will not be good for PR. I am really saddened and sorry to have to write this on the public forum. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by 162eRI; 11-02-2009 at 06:01 AM..
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,462
|
I agree with 162eRI, it doesn't really make sense to restrict them from having a sub forum if they still have a chance of being implemented into PR.
If you've got a technical limit on the max number of sub forums, you could split them up into multiple forums like 'released community mods' or 'European community mods'. It's clear that you strongly encourage opfor factions instead and that's understandable, but to deny any future/WIP blufor factions from having forums doesn't seem fair IMO. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
![]() |
I also agree with 162eRI,we may check the progress that ROC guys made,this is really a frustration for the enthusiasm,may be making a sub forums is really a hard-dealing problem,but I suggest we may let the leader of ROC community to join our community,so we may have a good cooperation.
It is snowing here and my fingers are frozen,so I type less words... as snazz said,they have a chance of being implemented into PR,and it's a big one! |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
PR Developer
![]() |
Let me add some more words then
BLUFOR factions are still welcome. They always were, they always will be. Just because at this moment one gets no subforum, it doesn't mean they'll never get one or they'll never get in PR. That's a very unfortunate misunderstanding. I should have worded my initial post differently. The PR community has grown a lot over the last year or so and with that, more members think about creating a faction of their country. We're discussing how to organize our current and future (!!) community factions (not just forumwise), define the necessary requirements, level of quality, etc, etc. That, plus the fact that we look forward to seeing some more OPFOR love in PR. So, the decision for now is to not create more subforums for BLUFOR (exceptions may be made). It's a temporary thing, to give us some "quiet" time to discuss all the things we want to discuss. It's also to prevent us from doing stuff and later on come to the conclusion we should have done things differently. That's pretty much what I wanted to add here. Cheers, Dune PS: Oh, H162eRI, you're not groaning (as I told you over PM's a couple of times already |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
PR Admin/Military Advisor
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
@[R-COM]162eRI - Serious question. Why are you developing 3 seperate comfacs? Should you not just concentrate on one? In terms of results, it's better to have one complete comfac than 3 in development. We may not be factoring comfacs in come post 1.0 for all we know (purely an unfounded example).....so you could be left with 3 unreleased factions. | |||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "By profession I am a To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , and take pride in that fact. But I am prouder, infinitely prouder, to be a father". - Gen Douglas MacAurthur. -Proud wearer of motorcycle helmets since 1998. |
||||
|
|
Last edited by [R-DEV]Gaz; 11-05-2009 at 09:19 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
First of all. Thanks for [R-COM]162eRI and [R-DEV]jojomeirenpin support to us. Though the application was not permitted. We will follow [R-DEV]AfterDune's suggestion, keep doing.
We have been planning how to join PR community from January this year. Taiwan faction team was initially a team developing Operation Taiwan Straight (OTS Mod). It have worked with PR dev team once (maybe don't remember). Because of the map in v0.8 operation barracuda(under Taiwan control, but China claim they have it) inspired the notion to create a new faction. We inherited ex-team's achievements and turned to work on PR Community Factions. PRC_Heavy_Z told us what elements should a Community Factions have at that time. Later, Anhkhoa brought the proposal. It was unexpected to me. Till [R-COM]162eRI suggested us to apply a sub-forum recently.(he doesn't participate in developing) 162eRI and AfterDune helped us. However it is not permitted. We will follow the suggestion, keep doing, till PR no more accept new faction. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
PR Developer
![]() |
nozumu, keep up the great work your doing! I'm sure there is many looking forward to it, and I'm sure Chuc will be interested to help you guys out too once he has cleared his slate, which is completely full up I think atm
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,135
|
Thanks for the answers!
Quote:
If I wrote all this it's because we were amazed by how fast the two new community factions get official and their own subforum... I mean, the Taiwanese faction planned to join PR since January 2009 and mine was around the forum since January 2009 as well. The point was, we didn't see many stuff made by this two factions at the time. Don't misunderstood me, I'm really happy for them as I would love to see all the factions get to this point of having their own subforum because of the work they accomplished. We thought it was this way since for the French Forces we had to wait and show all the work we did before getting our subforum. Nonetheless, the two new factions are both doing an amazing job with all their new models etc. But you can understand our surprise at that time and the fact we couldn't have like them our own official subforum. Still, I'm glad that things are doing faster for community factions now and that we get someone for us ([R-DEV]AfterDune) who take care of everything. Quote:
I'm thinking myself about the North Korean OPFOR faction which is also (by all means) easy to make as we get mostly all the vehicles and weapons. The rough point would be the player models. Anyway, that's just an idea ^^ And since I know how hard it is to make new factions, I will just keep it an idea... Quote:
| |||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||||
|
|
Last edited by 162eRI; 11-08-2009 at 06:02 PM..
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 218
|
nvm, delete my post please
|
|
Random mumble talk between maps
Dude1-Ive heard that people, through gaming, satisfy their need for social life. Dude2-LOL Dude3-Thats why I play, to make friends. Dude4- I play for the chicks. -silence- Dude5- Bourgh-bourgh-bourgh-booorghurK? |
|
|
|
Last edited by =(DK)=stoffen_tacticalsup; 11-09-2009 at 03:16 PM..
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: norfolk
Posts: 8,075
|
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| community, factions, subforums |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|