Moderate all servers that don't have the ability to admin their servers properly.

[112233]

Can we actually get some good authorized servers in the server list? I can pull some of the bad servers off the top of my head. But I'll organize it into a list to make it easy. These servers are supposed to represent Project Reality's gameplay and they are not achieving it therefor they should be removed? Which was the entire point of licensing and beta limited servers in the first place. Seriously if you're going to moderate who can host, moderate the actual servers... or actually give out hosting to people who are capable.
Sisu server
-Incapable admins who are unable to find out who is baseraping mainbases
-Almost no admins, maybe one or two and the only admin ever in the server is AFK 90% of the time.
-This makes for general BAD pr experience.

Alpha-networks
-No admins, no reporting system for naughty players at all.

DAO.nu
-Pingkick on a limited official server and no VON last time I checked.

RIP RustyInPlaces
-Pingkick on a limited official server

Tacticalgamer
-Poor FPS compared to some other hosts, probably because they are packing 4 Arma 2 servers on the same box, Arma 2 server uses max 2 cores so I'm guessing they don't have a top of the line system running it either.

[[R-DEV]epoch]

Re. Alpha Networks, I was on there for some time yesterday "admining". However my time is limited at the moment. For sure we need some more people able to admin on there so I'll get something sorted. Haven't seen any major issues whilst I've been on, apart from idiots using cargo tractors as transport out of base.

Ping kicks are the server's choice. AFAIK it's enabled on all servers, and rightly so.
DAO had VON last time I checked.
TG - can't comment as I don't know the specifics of their hardware.

As per whether servers should be added or removed, that's not your decision. It's mine, and I'm happy with the servers we have. However, thank you for your feedback, which I'll pass onto the server admins.