|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Community Modding Making or wanting help making your own asset? Check in here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
Lol, imagine that the name of "MEC is Iran? But then I can't see the Iranian hardware ingame or relive the trench warfare of the Iran-Iraq war in MEC vs. Iran-maps?
Main motivation is that MEC and similar alliances is a somewhat stupid concept. A large army and regional military powerhouse like Iran deserves its own playable army, imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Québec, Montréal
Posts: 1,226
|
|
|
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 249
|
As much as I disagree with the seperation of the MEC, I do think Iran is deserving of its own faction, which would basically be a reskinned MEC with a few new assets probably. They'd make a better faction than half the ones already being worked on at least. In the G3-Khaybar issue, I think I might prefer the G3 since it would make Iran more different. The Khaybar seems to be more or less a 5.56 QBZ rifle.
|
|
"I'm not crazy, I'm the only one who's not crazy!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 122
|
A lot can be achieved in the map scenario, if you line up an Insurgent team against 8 main battle tanks it isn't gonna be fun for the Insurgent team. If you think about it in a more even handed manor however you can make a realistic scenario that affords each team a decent chance of playing to their strentghs = a fun game for all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,842
|
im making an iranian map, this might fit nicely. but it depends.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by Psykogundam; 02-07-2009 at 12:36 PM..
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
I don't want to see any separation of MEC, absolutely not. I do not support AREMs suggestion with all these new ME-alliances, just think that a large army and important country like Iran deserves to be represented in PR. We are lacking conventional "OpFor"-armies (most of the ones being suggested are militia-style armies with outdated weaponry - Congo and North Korea) and Iran is, imo, an obvious choice.
Also, they use (or rather are planning on using) their own locally produced weaponry, which would add some variety alongside the regular Russian weaponry being used by this kind of factions in games. They will add another dimension to the Middle Eastern theatre in PR - non-NATO conventional armies fighting against each other (Iran will of course not be best friends with the arab MEC). I'm tired over the fact that all the conventional warfare in PR have to involve atleast one NATO army. Right now I'm not sure whether to go for the Iranian army "here and now"-concept with G3s, T-72s, etc or the "near future"-alternative with their own weapons alongside the ones I already mentioned. This before I start "recruiting" people with more modding-experience than me. The first alternative will, obviously, be easier to complete but the result will be boring compared to the other one. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 20
|
If this idea gets anywhere, I think we should go with the near future option. Otherwise, any possible Iran vs. MEC maps would get confusing and there wouldn't be much difference between Iran and the MEC apart from skins and voices, and possibly a few vehicles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 249
|
The MEC could be given some of the proposed "UAL" equipment like AUG's. They could even be handed their AK-103s back. I agree with Storm, no dissolution of MEC, just create a new Iran and have MEC be the Arab states.
I think the problem is that too many people are obsessed with BluFor factions, nobody takes OpFor seriously. I mean, no offense if you're from these countries, but we have Canadian, Dutch, Polish, and Norwegian factions all receiving more attention each than any OpFor faction, even China is ignored. More and more people just get to work on their home countries even if they add NOTHING to the game. Canadians are Americans with Leopard tanks, Dutch are practically Canadian clones, Poles are slightly different Russians, Norwegians are a bit more unique but none of these people are even in places or could be in scenarios not already taken. On the other hand, work on needed Chinese assets like their new car (VN3) and tank (ZTZ-99) is stagnant as far as I can tell. MEC are actually being downgraded, with the new Vodnik cancelled as far as I can tell. In the North Korean thread people actually seriously suggested giving them T-34 tanks and DP and Type 99 machine guns from WW2 simply because one was shown on a propaganda poster and reserve forces use old tanks. Hell, the only OpFor factions people are thinking of making are Iran, North Korea, and the DR of Congo for Christ's sake. For BluFor there is Russia, Norway, France, Japan, South Korea, Germany, the Dutch, Canada, Australia, Poland, the UAL, and probably others I'm forgetting. The Blufor/OpFor disparity is ridiculous. |
|
"I'm not crazy, I'm the only one who's not crazy!"
|
|
|
|
Last edited by Hresvelgr; 02-07-2009 at 05:18 PM..
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
Can Russia be considered "BluFor"? There are plans for Germany vs. Russia maps so they will probably be fighting NATO.
Anyway, I completely agree with you! With this many NATO factions and so few non-NATO there won't be many enemies for them poor westerners to choose from. And the MEC and Chinese (and especially the taliban) will have a hard time fighting all these Europeans and North Americans... More conventional and modern non-NATO armies are needed! Iran would be an awesome choice for so many reasons, I've listed some of them in my previous post Now, thanks to the Iran Military Forums we have the advisors and reference material needed to get this going. What is needed is modders. I'm trying my best to learn the basics right now, but it will probably take some time before I can get badass tank models ingame ^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| army, faction, iran, islamic, proposal, republic |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|