[?] Does disabling mip-mapping decrease performance? - Page 2

matt.b · 03-31-2007, 05:31 AM

there's a big problem with bf2s renderer & the staticmesh shader wrt mipping (angled surfaces blur too heavily), but the bundledmesh shader (used on players, kits, vehicles etc) looked ok when i did a comparison.

you could possibly generate a lower number of mips when you save the texture (3 for a small texture, 5 for a big one), that'll stop it blurring out so quickly & retain some optimization.

GeZe · 03-31-2007, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]matt.b

there's a big problem with bf2s renderer & the staticmesh shader wrt mipping (angled surfaces blur too heavily), but the bundledmesh shader (used on players, kits, vehicles etc) looked ok when i did a comparison.

you could possibly generate a lower number of mips when you save the texture (3 for a small texture, 5 for a big one), that'll stop it blurring out so quickly & retain some optimization.

okay, thanks, I'll do that

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-31-2007, 05:31 AM	#11
matt.b Retired PR Developer Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: uk Posts: 1,010	there's a big problem with bf2s renderer & the staticmesh shader wrt mipping (angled surfaces blur too heavily), but the bundledmesh shader (used on players, kits, vehicles etc) looked ok when i did a comparison. you could possibly generate a lower number of mips when you save the texture (3 for a small texture, 5 for a big one), that'll stop it blurring out so quickly & retain some optimization.

Sponsored Links