|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Project Reality News Project Reality news releases and announcements. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 938
|
Quote:
I do remember some model highlights on the m14 EBR and a new dragunov with bipod from before the 0.9 release, never heard anything about those anymore, are they still in development or are they rated low-priority? | |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PACA
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
That new russian sniper rifle too. Great stuff anyways. | |
|
"Some nerd did the math, and to dodge a bullet like that, those tits would have to break the sound barrier."
|
||
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,470
|
*Excited face*
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
PR:ArmA2 Contributor
![]() |
The Panther looks amazing - PRAA will do it much more justice than BF2 though I think
The CSB's - why not just butcher a CR2 model and take the turret off and whack the bridge model on top instead of having it come from inside a logi truck??? |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. >>Limited Internet Access - May not respond to PMs<<
|
|
|
|
Last edited by [R-CON]Burton; 06-20-2010 at 12:23 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
PR Mapper Team
![]() |
Thank you Snazz, but Burton I suggest you read that topic because it explains it in more detail since a TBT (Tank Bridge Transporter) is basically a truck that can carry CSBs which I mention in that quote the logi truck isn't too far off.
It also wouldn't be just a matter of "butchering" a Challenger 2 if we did go down that rout. We might be able to get away with having every faction using the same type of CSB even thou in r/l pretty much each faction has there own unique one, but we certianlly wouldn't be able to get away with having the Chinese deploying bridges with a Challenger 2 and we would have to make a AVLB (Armoured Vehicle Launched Bridge) for every single faction which would be a huge amount of work and then for what, to have a bunch of players taken away from the front line to deploy bridges in a vehicle that will only be used a few times in a round for that job? With using the logistics truck we not only encourage people to use them more to ferry supplies about the battlefield but when they are not doing that, they can also deploy bridges. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: harriman,New York
Posts: 68
|
I cant wait for the new M16A4 foregrips and 3D sights.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,662
|
I've already seen all this stuff! Where's the new stuff
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Osijek
Posts: 108
|
verry nice
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| highlights, project, reality, reel, update |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|