project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > News / Announcements > Project Reality News
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Project Reality News Project Reality news releases and announcements.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2009, 10:13 PM   #41
WHPRaveman

WHPRaveman's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffNStuff View Post
those places dont just shoot on flare out at a time, it shoots them out like it has flare diareea
ROFL!!!!!!!1


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
WHPRaveman is offline
Old 12-08-2009, 09:43 AM   #42
SilentWarrior

SilentWarrior's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAJTHOMAS View Post
I also prefer the all or nothing approach. Of all the betas, I've like no rallies the best, although it doesn't always work on all maps (the suggestion of reintroducing time limited supply drops for map with diffcult terrain, and expecially where one side has air superiorty, like Korengal was a good one to at least look in to imo).

Otherwise I'd rather just have the old rally system. The other varitaions seem very complicated with little gain that I've seen.



These are all just points which come down to badly tactics and decision making.

If an MG is firing at your position, you don't pop your head out that the point of them. Don't complain about being killed by MGs if you're like trying to engage in a head on firefight with one.

If your pilots are morons and your SLs dont build FBs you lose.

If you're TOW is poor, you'll have trouble as US on EJOD.

What's the point of playing a team based multiplayer game if you don't want to rely on your team for anything?
I dont like to COMPLETELY rely on one single player for my gaming experience, when there is 32 players in my team.

I dont want to be forced to go AFK while waiting for next map because after a 30 minute walk I accidentaly turn the wrong corner and got MGed by the "Huye squad" member that went in there just for MG, asked for rooftop landing, and was there just 2 minutes on a completely retarded zone... where he fall off the building while moving forward on the edge.

If I am going to be owned like that, I want to go down in a fair, good firefight. Not because of some nub MG man on the edge of the map shooting me down from 600 meters.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
SilentWarrior is offline
Old 12-08-2009, 10:07 AM   #43
SilentWarrior

SilentWarrior's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

"
If your pilots are morons and your SLs dont build FBs you lose.
"

Pilots are a lost cause most of the times.... it would be good to have a system to only allow pilots with enough flight time and reputation inside them (yeah, keep dreaming).

As for firebases, I see so much retarded firebase locations that it never stops amasing me. Specially those so called "FOB" or "Logistics" squads that make firebases in open areas where the enemy can easily spawn kill you (yeah it happens ALOT).


"
If you're TOW is poor, you'll have trouble as US on EJOD.
"

Having played TOW crewman before, I know it is pretty easy to lose it to enemy tank fire, specially if they know what they are doing. Those t72 are great at hiding in the desert, and if the driver gets out, you can pretty much forget about taking one down before he takes you down if they have a good gunner and your team doesnt provide you with enough intel. And i am not talking about the initial round rush for the kill either, since i never did that.


If you expect your team to be leetzor players, you are pretty much delusional. It only shows that you havent played PR enough. As much as I would like PR will never have the player base of BF42 or DesertCombat. Those are long gone, pretty much as soon as vBF2 came out, they too went out. There are simply way too many vBF2 players (vBF2 makes CS players cry atm).


The struggle right now is about gameplay VS realism on PR. You can only have so much realism before you screw gameplay.

To have very long range tank battles, you need to have very good anti-tank guarded locations where infantry can have their battles. Same goes for aircraft. Either that or make it so hard for them to see infantry or get near infantry that they would simply lose interest in chasing infantry.

I beleave the goal for PR (on BF2 engine) should be towards speciallized maps, such as "mostly infantry", "mostly tanks", "mostly aircraft", like Desert Combat was. There should be a tank only map, with loads of tanks for nice tank battles, like the DC "Battle for 73 eastings". Aircraft only like that map with the big "NO FLY ZONE" sign. Or infantry only (supported by transport choppers or cars or wateva light vehicles) like "Lost Village".

Maps like Kashan Desert, even tho balanced maps, have a weak infantry gameplay (even tho sometimes very fun).



On a side note, would love to see a building infiltration (hostage like) map. I asked for it for Desert Combat some years ago, but BF42 engine simply couldnt handdle it well. A Big building with swat like teams, against insurgent hostage takers. Where there was multiple floors, with multiple entry points. Insurgents spawning inside the building, and americans coming in by car or chopper then having to clear floor by floor. Say DCs "Oil Rig" map.


PS: where the hell is the edit post button?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
SilentWarrior is offline
Old 12-08-2009, 08:30 PM   #44
Sliver

Sliver's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

#EJOD is a MEC-Rush-Map:
Tank + APCs take City first and then Gasstation
If US Team is good, they can destroy the Tank or one APC before they got owned by the rest. Current EJOD-Record with 64 Players: 4 Min.

#Kongreal -> Basecamping Map, US havent a real chance to destroy more then 1-2 caches

#Ramiel -> US can destroy max. 5-6 Caches before they run out of Tickets

#Fallujha -> US can take max 3-4 Cashes before they run out of Tickets

#Al-Basrah ->Max. Cashes ~5, then no tickets left

#Archer -> Max. ~6, US loses to much Choppers (=Tickets), building Firebases does not work cause they are most time overrun/camped by taliban or to far away

#Fools Road -> Russian win if the other team does not destroy the mainbase-bridge

#Sunset -> A simple Team Deathmatch Map without any strategy

#Road to Kyongan Ni -> Remeber Sunset? -> nearly the same, +10% strategedy

#Asahd Kal -> Team Deathmacth Map Nr.3, a littlebit more strategic as Kyongan but still Deathmatch

#Qwai -> approximately balanced but the chin. APC's are a littlebit to heavy armed and they can swim so the Strikers are most time a metal-coffin if the TOW-Humvee/HAT cant destroy all heavy chin. APCs

#Karbala -> works perfect, remove the Little Birds so they cant wasted (->losing tickets) and its completly balanced

Even more Maps that work realy good with Beta-changes: Muttrah, Koselkz, Kashan, Quinling, Baracuda, Jabal, Ghost Train, Mestia, Tad Sae, "this old Night-Map where you play now at daylight (i forgot the name sorry )"

These are my impressions so far..
Biggest problem is the Insurgent-balance! They got tooooo many spawnpoints!!!!!!!!!!!!

By the way, sorry for my english ^^ xD
Sliver is offline
Old 12-08-2009, 08:41 PM   #45
TOME Malambri

TOME Malambri's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

I despise this system, as does the rest of my clan. It gets in the way of our teamwork attempts.
TOME Malambri is offline
Old 12-10-2009, 02:06 PM   #46
Smith[EEF]
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOME Malambri View Post
I despise this system, as does the rest of my clan. It gets in the way of our teamwork attempts.
i thaught the same at first but it grew on me give it a chance
Smith[EEF] is offline
Old 12-11-2009, 02:56 AM   #47
Scared_420
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

for heavy terrain map it is near impossible to get a good spot to actually put up an fob and defend it, usa should have a huey wth crate in some of these maps and i think it will work better
Scared_420 is offline
Old 12-11-2009, 03:05 AM   #48
Bluedrake42

Bluedrake42's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

I think there should be some kindof icon, or other kind of status indicator for the RP's. Because otherwise its cumbersome for troops to find out if the RP is still up or not. A little icon in the top part of the screen or something like that would be nice just for a quick way to see if its up or not. (a countdown timer would also be nice to track the rp's "Lifetime" but I don't want to ask too much)
Bluedrake42 is offline
Old 12-11-2009, 04:25 AM   #49
Bonsai

Bonsai's Avatar
Send a message via ICQ to Bonsai Send a message via Skype™ to Bonsai
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluedrake42 View Post
I think there should be some kindof icon, or other kind of status indicator for the RP's. Because otherwise its cumbersome for troops to find out if the RP is still up or not. A little icon in the top part of the screen or something like that would be nice just for a quick way to see if its up or not. (a countdown timer would also be nice to track the rp's "Lifetime" but I don't want to ask too much)
Yeah like the "timer" inside our helmets we have IRL that shows us if the enemy has found our backpacks?

//irony off

If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles. Sun Tzu
Bonsai is offline
Old 12-11-2009, 07:39 PM   #50
corp_calqluslethal

corp_calqluslethal's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality v0.874D Open Gameplay Beta : Part 3

No rallies suck, simple as that. Please don't go through with this stupid change, ive played it for weeks now and i hate it. Makes for more walking people will build fb... and, who cares. People build fb already now it just seems like every squad is building them with the changes. The maps are huge people need rallies especially on insurgency, if your fb gets taking out you have to start from scatch. That change makes the game kinda suck.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
corp_calqluslethal is offline
Closed Thread


Tags
beta, gameplay, open, part, project, reality
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.