|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Project Reality News Project Reality news releases and announcements. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 153
|
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lisboa
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
I dont want to be forced to go AFK while waiting for next map because after a 30 minute walk I accidentaly turn the wrong corner and got MGed by the "Huye squad" member that went in there just for MG, asked for rooftop landing, and was there just 2 minutes on a completely retarded zone... where he fall off the building while moving forward on the edge. If I am going to be owned like that, I want to go down in a fair, good firefight. Not because of some nub MG man on the edge of the map shooting me down from 600 meters. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
#43 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lisboa
Posts: 51
|
"
If your pilots are morons and your SLs dont build FBs you lose. " Pilots are a lost cause most of the times.... it would be good to have a system to only allow pilots with enough flight time and reputation inside them (yeah, keep dreaming). As for firebases, I see so much retarded firebase locations that it never stops amasing me. Specially those so called "FOB" or "Logistics" squads that make firebases in open areas where the enemy can easily spawn kill you (yeah it happens ALOT). " If you're TOW is poor, you'll have trouble as US on EJOD. " Having played TOW crewman before, I know it is pretty easy to lose it to enemy tank fire, specially if they know what they are doing. Those t72 are great at hiding in the desert, and if the driver gets out, you can pretty much forget about taking one down before he takes you down if they have a good gunner and your team doesnt provide you with enough intel. And i am not talking about the initial round rush for the kill either, since i never did that. If you expect your team to be leetzor players, you are pretty much delusional. It only shows that you havent played PR enough. As much as I would like PR will never have the player base of BF42 or DesertCombat. Those are long gone, pretty much as soon as vBF2 came out, they too went out. There are simply way too many vBF2 players (vBF2 makes CS players cry atm). The struggle right now is about gameplay VS realism on PR. You can only have so much realism before you screw gameplay. To have very long range tank battles, you need to have very good anti-tank guarded locations where infantry can have their battles. Same goes for aircraft. Either that or make it so hard for them to see infantry or get near infantry that they would simply lose interest in chasing infantry. I beleave the goal for PR (on BF2 engine) should be towards speciallized maps, such as "mostly infantry", "mostly tanks", "mostly aircraft", like Desert Combat was. There should be a tank only map, with loads of tanks for nice tank battles, like the DC "Battle for 73 eastings". Aircraft only like that map with the big "NO FLY ZONE" sign. Or infantry only (supported by transport choppers or cars or wateva light vehicles) like "Lost Village". Maps like Kashan Desert, even tho balanced maps, have a weak infantry gameplay (even tho sometimes very fun). On a side note, would love to see a building infiltration (hostage like) map. I asked for it for Desert Combat some years ago, but BF42 engine simply couldnt handdle it well. A Big building with swat like teams, against insurgent hostage takers. Where there was multiple floors, with multiple entry points. Insurgents spawning inside the building, and americans coming in by car or chopper then having to clear floor by floor. Say DCs "Oil Rig" map. PS: where the hell is the edit post button? |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
|
#EJOD is a MEC-Rush-Map:
Tank + APCs take City first and then Gasstation If US Team is good, they can destroy the Tank or one APC before they got owned by the rest. Current EJOD-Record with 64 Players: 4 Min. #Kongreal -> Basecamping Map, US havent a real chance to destroy more then 1-2 caches #Ramiel -> US can destroy max. 5-6 Caches before they run out of Tickets #Fallujha -> US can take max 3-4 Cashes before they run out of Tickets #Al-Basrah ->Max. Cashes ~5, then no tickets left #Archer -> Max. ~6, US loses to much Choppers (=Tickets), building Firebases does not work cause they are most time overrun/camped by taliban or to far away #Fools Road -> Russian win if the other team does not destroy the mainbase-bridge #Sunset -> A simple Team Deathmatch Map without any strategy #Road to Kyongan Ni -> Remeber Sunset? -> nearly the same, +10% strategedy #Asahd Kal -> Team Deathmacth Map Nr.3, a littlebit more strategic as Kyongan but still Deathmatch #Qwai -> approximately balanced but the chin. APC's are a littlebit to heavy armed and they can swim so the Strikers are most time a metal-coffin if the TOW-Humvee/HAT cant destroy all heavy chin. APCs #Karbala -> works perfect, remove the Little Birds so they cant wasted (->losing tickets) and its completly balanced Even more Maps that work realy good with Beta-changes: Muttrah, Koselkz, Kashan, Quinling, Baracuda, Jabal, Ghost Train, Mestia, Tad Sae, "this old Night-Map where you play now at daylight (i forgot the name sorry These are my impressions so far.. Biggest problem is the Insurgent-balance! They got tooooo many spawnpoints!!!!!!!!!!!! By the way, sorry for my english ^^ xD |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 75
|
I despise this system, as does the rest of my clan. It gets in the way of our teamwork attempts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mold
Posts: 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 348
|
for heavy terrain map it is near impossible to get a good spot to actually put up an fob and defend it, usa should have a huey wth crate in some of these maps and i think it will work better
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 634
|
I think there should be some kindof icon, or other kind of status indicator for the RP's. Because otherwise its cumbersome for troops to find out if the RP is still up or not. A little icon in the top part of the screen or something like that would be nice just for a quick way to see if its up or not. (a countdown timer would also be nice to track the rp's "Lifetime" but I don't want to ask too much)
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
![]() |
Quote:
//irony off | |
|
If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles. Sun Tzu
|
||
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 213
|
No rallies suck, simple as that. Please don't go through with this stupid change, ive played it for weeks now and i hate it. Makes for more walking people will build fb... and, who cares. People build fb already now it just seems like every squad is building them with the changes. The maps are huge people need rallies especially on insurgency, if your fb gets taking out you have to start from scatch. That change makes the game kinda suck.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| beta, gameplay, open, part, project, reality |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|