project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > News / Announcements > PR Highlights > PR Dev Journal Archives > 2009
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2009, 10:41 PM   #81
G.Drew

G.Drew's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to G.Drew
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

This sounds very very nice indeed.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
G.Drew is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 10:44 PM   #82
daranz

daranz's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

The changes sound good to me, maybe with the exception of having to use crates to request kits. But then, I barely request kits as it is, so I could live with getting to use them even more rarely.

I do hope that we'll see plenty of APCs now that they are the primary transportation vehicle. A lot of people will have to adjust to the idea of being transported in APCs, and I predict a lot of rage as APC crews and infantry squads disagree on what a safe spot to drop infantry is.

I do hope that APCs aren't entirely relegated to a role of land choppers. My fear is that doing anything other than driving back and forth between main and combat will be frowned upon, and infantry won't be able to call upon an APC to support them with fire. I understand the idea of not making APCs light tanks, but I don't wanna see it go to the extreme the other way.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
daranz is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 10:55 PM   #83
Blakeman
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by daranz View Post
I do hope that APCs aren't entirely relegated to a role of land choppers. My fear is that doing anything other than driving back and forth between main and combat will be frowned upon, and infantry won't be able to call upon an APC to support them with fire. I understand the idea of not making APCs light tanks, but I don't wanna see it go to the extreme the other way.
I don't think it will be like that at all. Infantry will still be able to spawn at rallies and FOBs, this will just make the APCs 'get in the fight' and not be some sort of standoff light tank that just covers only from afar. APCs will now be part of a spearhead needed to get in there and provide support for infantry since they will need kit support and transport to far objectives.

I still want to know if Jeeps will spawn at FOBs still, or if that was taken out as well. I believe there was talk about AT emplacements at FOBs though?
Blakeman is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 10:59 PM   #84
Alan

Alan's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

I'm only seeing Ural trucks here. Will there be an Anglo-American canvas covered truck as well? Or will everyone be using the Ural in 0.85 (if only temporarily for some)
Alan is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 11:00 PM   #85
=EB=Reaper

=EB=Reaper's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

im just looing at the images.

[IMG]http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4066/truck1ek6.jpgP/IMG]

But if this is ment to be a convoy, whos driving the other two trucks?

Well any way this is a very nice update, cant wait to play the new update.
=EB=Reaper is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 11:00 PM   #86
=EB=Reaper

=EB=Reaper's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

Sorry couldnt edit my post.

=EB=Reaper is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 11:06 PM   #87
[R-MOD]Spec
Forum Moderator

[R-MOD]Spec's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

Thats probably just a lack of testers at the time the screenshot was taken, nothing really important
[R-MOD]Spec is online now
Old 01-01-2009, 11:15 PM   #88
General Dragosh

General Dragosh's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to General Dragosh
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

Wow, im really looking forward to this...

No more Super Engie

But i aint giving up


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Newly ordered sig !
General Dragosh is offline
Old 01-01-2009, 11:18 PM   #89
Skodz
Default

Hmmm... these are lot of changes...

No more kit request at Rallypoints and forward operations base ?
No more humvee, landrover, etc. ? Why, is this even realistic ? I am no expert but light jeeps seems very popular in modern "assymetric" warfare...
I agree with the logistic only big truck tho but hopefully you are gonna remove the lil engi jeeps to replace it by the new logistic truck and make it so there are more jeeps then truck.

Sorry unable to edit...

If you guys remove completely jeeps (5 min respawn) and make it APC only (10 min respawn)

We already have problems with vehicles wasting, now we will have real tea party at main waiting for 1 apc to spawn for the entire team...
Skodz is offline
Last edited by [R-DEV]Gaz; 01-01-2009 at 11:45 PM..
Old 01-01-2009, 11:25 PM   #90
youm0nt

youm0nt's Avatar
Default Re: [Gameplay] Logistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]dbzao View Post

These screenshots look like something out of ArmA, especially the first one, it doesn't even look like BF2

(o,o)
|)__)

-"-"-
O RLY?
youm0nt is offline
Closed Thread


Tags
gameplay, logistics
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.