|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#571 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure." I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#572 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sofia
Posts: 412
|
Oh come on guys, with the jeeps being removed i'm almost 100% that this will be abused in public servers, just imagine a sniper in the main base, without transport, 1 supply truck left then he aksks himself what should i do?Should i walk 15min to get to my target, or should i take the supply truck with me who can ressuply my rifle if i run out of ammo?
|
|
|
|
|
#573 |
![]() |
stop speculating and wait for .85 instead
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#574 |
![]() |
They could add TTL -"self destruct" - like on Mutrah.
Once a (certain) vehicle is "left" somewhere for X minutes -it blows up. I don't really like it but what can you do; other then kick vote the retards. |
|
|
|
|
#575 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
Sounds better then Self Destruct vehicles to me... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#576 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 814
|
One logistik change I do agree with tho is to have more "jeeps" and less supply trucks.
|
|
|
|
|
#577 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 222
|
the Logistics sound cool, but how much time it will take to repair a vehicle? and except clicking X, does an engineer have to get out and stand near the repair thing or something?
and why no more jeeps? jeeps are great |
|
|
|
|
#578 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 450
|
Quote:
Jeeps are used like blasty suicide mad rush cars, I'm glad to see them toned down a lot, though I wouldn't mind getting back 1 per FOB. | |
|
|
|
|
#579 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,201
|
i certainly wont be spending my time driving trucks to and from the main.
BUUUUT as a guy who likes camping roads with IEDs or RPGs, ambushes behind enemy lines are going to be SO much more rewarding! especially now that the trucks will only be able to carry two instead of a squad |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#580 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 814
|
Danny, these logistik truck are not even for engineer only... Anyone will be able to drive them away.
Quote:
Actually, I do not really disagree with the idea of having APC instead of "jeeps" on AAS but hopefully there will be atleast 1 for each squad because I will never want my squad APC to leave us on the field and go taxi another squad... Way to screw mechanised infantry and armor support... To resume, I love most 0.85 changes but Logistik Trucks and ingeneer not allowed to repair anymore... I think these 2 points will be the two most problematic things in-game. It'll be a "run for it" race to find a logistik truck and a smart driver for it. Or there will be none on the field due to it being destroyed OR people will use it as taxi OR smart and lucky squad will have one of these follow them to drop a repair crate instead of having an ingeneer repair them... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| gameplay, logistics |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|