|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
LinkBack (27) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
LinkBack (27) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-29-2008, 07:49 AM
|
#31 |
 
Join Date: May 2008
 United States of AmericaLocation: Asad Khal
Posts: 1,713
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
Candidate 3, interesting harbor design plus FIBUA, pure win.
|
|
"That means, Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son of a gun in space"
-Anon Gunnery Chief |
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 08:14 AM
|
#32 | |
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
United States of AmericaLocation: Mt. Etna
Posts: 227
 |
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
Quote:
| |
|
__________________________________________________ _________________
If it's worth shooting once, shoot it again. |
||
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 08:37 AM
|
#33 |
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
 United KingdomLocation: Cambridge
Posts: 3,313
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
Please make it a PLANM assault (PM PRC_HeavyZ about it)
They have amphibious tanks, HeavyZ told me Chuc (IIRC) has the PLA uniform skins and can quickly reskin them to PLANM. A PLA force attacking a NATO held port would really be quite good. Would be very different. Especially if you used a NATO faction without amphibious vehicles, they would be restricted to land/bridges while the PLA would not. They use the same rifles as the main PLA in PR use AFAIK (ask HeavyZ), so it would mainly be skinning the soldiers and adding the Type 63 amphibious tank: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...nk_-_above.jpg Armed with an 85mm gun. It would not need to be an attack from a ship either, it could be over land with the PLA being able to flank into the sea. |
|
XKCD forums, in the middle of a perfectly sane conversation:
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? Best post ever made! EG: PPSh is made of win and quite possibly stamped sheet metal |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 09:25 AM
|
#34 |
  
Join Date: Jun 2006
 SwedenLocation: Skellefteå|Sweden
Posts: 4,210
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
1 or 4
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Scot:"your still the sexiest swede man I have seen" To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#35 |
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
 BrazilLocation: Brasil with S, not Z, Z makes it ugly.
Posts: 2,873
 |
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
3 has too much industryal area and 4 has almost nothing.
I stay between 1 and 2. A littler more to 1 than 2. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita" [R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking." Meanwhile, in a topic about fast-ropes...:[R-DEV]fuzzhead:"good suggestion, can we get this in for v0.91?" |
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 09:37 AM
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
 NetherlandsPosts: 2,933
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
Uphill fights can go unbalanced very quick! I think Ill go with candidat 4
|
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 10:05 AM
|
#37 |
|
PR:ArmA2 Beta Test Team
Join Date: May 2006
United KingdomPosts: 1,780
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
All sounds good.. i hope you get to make the Hill map idea one day.. i really like the sound of that!
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 10:29 AM
|
#38 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
 NorwayLocation: Norway
Posts: 3,197
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
3 looks too similar with Muttrah. I like 4
|
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 11:43 AM
|
#39 |
 Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England - Bournemouth
Posts: 10
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
1 looks really nice like the layout, and a good mix of city to open land and water, would make for some intresting tacitcs and firefights.
2 looks good, apart from a lot of open dockard, not many buildings I think that 3 has too much city in it, nice to have some city and open land the layout of the land and city in 4 is nice, I like the industrial look, but its too small for my liking. so all in all 1 gets my vote. |
|
|
|
09-29-2008, 11:48 AM
|
#40 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
NetherlandsLocation: Den Haag
Posts: 15
|
Re: [Map] Siege at Ochamachira
I would go for no. 2. I like this harbour lay-out the best!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| irontaxi, map, ochamachira, siege, wip |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
