|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Asad Khal
Posts: 1,962
|
Candidate 3, interesting harbor design plus FIBUA, pure win.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() |
If you are after a coastal map with forests and a port to defend then image 2 or image 4 are the best and I would opt for image 2.
|
|
__________________________________________________ _________________
If it's worth shooting once, shoot it again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 3,650
|
Please make it a PLANM assault (PM PRC_HeavyZ about it)
They have amphibious tanks, HeavyZ told me Chuc (IIRC) has the PLA uniform skins and can quickly reskin them to PLANM. A PLA force attacking a NATO held port would really be quite good. Would be very different. Especially if you used a NATO faction without amphibious vehicles, they would be restricted to land/bridges while the PLA would not. They use the same rifles as the main PLA in PR use AFAIK (ask HeavyZ), so it would mainly be skinning the soldiers and adding the Type 63 amphibious tank: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...nk_-_above.jpg Armed with an 85mm gun. It would not need to be an attack from a ship either, it could be over land with the PLA being able to flank into the sea. |
|
XKCD forums, in the middle of a perfectly sane conversation:
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? Best post ever made! EG: PPSh is made of win and quite possibly stamped sheet metal |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() |
1 or 4
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() |
3 has too much industryal area and 4 has almost nothing.
I stay between 1 and 2. A littler more to 1 than 2. |
|
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking." Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever." [R-DEV]Rudd:"if a pidgeon lands on the phone line I lose internet for 3 days" [R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro." (yes, it was about me) [R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,727
|
Uphill fights can go unbalanced very quick! I think Ill go with candidat 4
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,148
|
All sounds good.. i hope you get to make the Hill map idea one day.. i really like the sound of that!
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,190
|
3 looks too similar with Muttrah. I like 4
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England - Bournemouth
Posts: 10
|
1 looks really nice like the layout, and a good mix of city to open land and water, would make for some intresting tacitcs and firefights.
2 looks good, apart from a lot of open dockard, not many buildings I think that 3 has too much city in it, nice to have some city and open land the layout of the land and city in 4 is nice, I like the industrial look, but its too small for my liking. so all in all 1 gets my vote. |
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Den Haag
Posts: 20
|
I would go for no. 2. I like this harbour lay-out the best!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| irontaxi, map, ochamachira, siege, wip |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|