[Gameplay] Deployable Assets - Page 5

Hotrod525 · 06-19-2008, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LekyIRL

I like the whole idea about there not needing to be a commander. Too many times have I seen people being forced to be commander just to get bunkers/firebases.

Me too... And so many time i seen people go commander just for give Target Coordinate for A10 since Laser from Soflam dont stay enought long time. Maybe something is on the way may be not, but, i think Squad Leader should be able to give target coordinate, whit or whitout commander. Close Air Support work whit Aircraft and Radioman down in the field, they dont rely on Commanding chain for that...

Renegade Warrior · 06-19-2008, 10:40 AM

Sounds good

~~Waaah_Wah~~ · 06-19-2008, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ironcomatose

I know but thats why i said good luck finding two huey pilots

You only need one

Ironcomatose · 06-19-2008, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waaah_Wah

You only need one

In a perfect world, yes. In PR,

LudacrisKill · 06-19-2008, 01:11 PM

Hmmm... not too sure on this. I dont like the idea of squad leaders being able to deploy assets without a commander. Yes, its annoying when there isnt a commander to accept build order. BUT, how annoying is it going to be to see 2-3 firebases in the most stupid positions done by some idiot. [Idea: What about assets only being able to be deployed by a squad of 5-6?]

I liked the whole defensive/offensive asset system in 0.75. I hope by giving so much freedom on where to deploy them we dont loose the strategic options commanders have. I may be wrong, but I think we might see careless play with a bit more freedom.

I hope a lot of testing goes on before release, with so much antisipation and people expectations so high it could all go badly wrong

hall0 · 06-19-2008, 02:02 PM

Nice changes

Sabre_tooth_tigger · 06-19-2008, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LudacrisKill

Hmmm... not too sure on this. I dont like the idea of squad leaders being able to deploy assets without a commander. Yes, its annoying when there isnt a commander to accept build order. BUT, how annoying is it going to be to see 2-3 firebases in the most stupid positions done by some idiot.

As soon as anyone goes CO they can remotely shut down these rogue or useless firebases in seconds with a right click of his mouse on the map.

CO has complete control in that respect

One thought I had about the CO post is what will be done about beach assault maps like Jabal.
Will this asset be tied to the beach flags and spawn in like a vehicle, it wont be much use situated on the carrier

MarineSeaknight · 06-19-2008, 03:01 PM

Well, I thought the empty space was quite obvious...

Deployable TOWs?

Gunwing · 06-19-2008, 05:00 PM

Well I can see that the AAs, and the HMGs will help out big time when it comes to defence for fire bases. The AA guns will be back to normal for manual AA right? that crappy thing we have now IE Stinger turret sucks.

~~Waaah_Wah~~ · 06-19-2008, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ironcomatose

In a perfect world, yes. In PR,

I dont know what servers you play on, but i've seen pilots that are perfectly capable of dropping 2 crates in the same location

06-19-2008, 10:40 AM	#42
Renegade Warrior Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 155 Location: Twickenham	Re: [Gameplay] Deployable Assets Sounds good
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Smoke going down!

06-19-2008, 01:11 PM	#45
LudacrisKill Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 270 United Kingdom Location: London	Re: [Gameplay] Deployable Assets Hmmm... not too sure on this. I dont like the idea of squad leaders being able to deploy assets without a commander. Yes, its annoying when there isnt a commander to accept build order. BUT, how annoying is it going to be to see 2-3 firebases in the most stupid positions done by some idiot. [Idea: What about assets only being able to be deployed by a squad of 5-6?] I liked the whole defensive/offensive asset system in 0.75. I hope by giving so much freedom on where to deploy them we dont loose the strategic options commanders have. I may be wrong, but I think we might see careless play with a bit more freedom. I hope a lot of testing goes on before release, with so much antisipation and people expectations so high it could all go badly wrong

06-19-2008, 02:02 PM	#46
hall0 Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,690 Germany Location: Bavaria	Re: [Gameplay] Deployable Assets Nice changes

06-19-2008, 03:01 PM	#48
MarineSeaknight Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 288 United States of America Location: Southern California	Re: [Gameplay] Deployable Assets Well, I thought the empty space was quite obvious... Deployable TOWs?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Testing Team: Serious Business Waiting for Reapar to become a DEV before I can quote him.

06-19-2008, 05:00 PM	#49
Gunwing Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 184	Re: [Gameplay] Deployable Assets Well I can see that the AAs, and the HMGs will help out big time when it comes to defence for fire bases. The AA guns will be back to normal for manual AA right? that crappy thing we have now IE Stinger turret sucks.
Gunwing Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 184

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links