project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Feedback
22 Sep 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 Feedback Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer).

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2012, 09:12 AM   #21
[R-DEV]Rudd
PR:BF2 Developer
Supporting Member

[R-DEV]Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeHX View Post
Good for him(yay free kills).

Bad for his team.


This is a team game; not caw of dooty.
if he has a rifleman or two/crate nearby, then its fine lol.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[R-DEV]Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 05:05 PM   #22
ComradeHX

ComradeHX's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudd View Post
if he has a rifleman or two/crate nearby, then its fine lol.
If the destroyed humvee has a tank following it/near it, then it is not so fine.

HAT does have a pretty long reload time and deploy time.

Every shot wasted = lots of time for tank to kill the guy with HAT kit and proceed to roll over the rest of his team for a long time.

As far as realism goes; only really bored/stupid U.S. soldier would use heavy AT for massive overkill(those are free in PR but quite expensive in real life).

I am sure by now everyone realized the importance of HAT kit(especially when there is only one on the team) and how much wasting a shot can cost the team.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ComradeHX is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 05:34 PM   #23
Navo
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Jesus Christ for the love of all that's holy, why can't you understand that he meant that most can't hit a Humvee sized target at 350 3 times in a row. It was an example of the relative ineffectiveness of the German and Russian HAT kits. He didn't mean that he would use a HAT to engage a Humvee.

asdasdasdasdasdasd

*edit*

Also, your signature is god damn annoying
Navo is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 05:38 PM   #24
ComradeHX

ComradeHX's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Navo View Post
Jesus Christ for the love of all that's holy, why can't you understand that he meant that most can't hit a Humvee sized target at 350 3 times in a row. It was an example of the relative ineffectiveness of the German and Russian HAT kits. He didn't mean that he would use a HAT to engage a Humvee.

asdasdasdasdasdasd

*edit*

Also, your signature is god damn annoying
Signature is made for that reason. And yours is more annoying(that orange).

And my point is that HAT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE USED FOR SHOOTING SMALL TARGETS AT THAT DISTANCE ANYWAY(unless in your little world humvee is actually bigger than MBT). It is like saying sniper rifle cannot do full-auto and has huge movement penalty on deviation so it is pointless because it is less effective in CQB...

It is supposed to be effective(and it is) at its intended role and less effective in others; otherwise everyone should get this weapon because it is best at doing everything. If you ever looked at Soviet anti-tank defensive formation; RPG-7 is the LAST line(SPG-9 is in front of it, and ATGM/tank cannon even further) of defense against vehicles.
They are perfectly fine at the distance they are supposed to work at.

The real problem is the model of Russian AT, not effectiveness; it should have been something like RPG-29.
RPG-7 is equivalent of LAT at best; thus it was compensated with having two rounds instead of only one.

I am not going to mention Germans because I do not know as much about ze Germans.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ComradeHX is offline
Last edited by ComradeHX; 04-24-2012 at 06:06 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 09:58 PM   #25
[R-DEV]Spec
Lead Forum Moderator

[R-DEV]Spec's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Seriously guys, if you want to continue this discussion, do it via PM. The points of both of you have been noted by the forum community. Removing the last few posts due to them being off-topic fighting.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thanks to [R-MOD]IINoddyII for the signature! || If you need help or have a question, feel free to contact me via
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
_____________________________
Propriety is an adequate basis for behavior towards strangers, honesty is the only respectful way to treat friends.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[R-DEV]Spec is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 01:11 AM   #26
Hokunin
Banned
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

How about employing portable variant of "Metis M" ATGW for Russian Faction?
Hokunin is offline
Last edited by Hokunin; 08-27-2012 at 01:33 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 04:16 AM   #27
Souls Of Mischief

Souls Of Mischief's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Nevermind.
Souls Of Mischief is offline
Last edited by Souls Of Mischief; 08-27-2012 at 11:38 AM.. Reason: Misread
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 11:06 AM   #28
Stealthgato

Stealthgato's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

He means replacing the tandem warhead RPG with the Metis, not the TOW. That's one hell of a change, and it is possible, FH2 has the portable deployable mgs and Alpha Project made a Mk.19 that works the same.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Stealthgato is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 11:37 AM   #29
Souls Of Mischief

Souls Of Mischief's Avatar
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealthgato View Post
He means replacing the tandem warhead RPG with the Metis, not the TOW. That's one hell of a change, and it is possible, FH2 has the portable deployable mgs and Alpha Project made a Mk.19 that works the same.
Oh lord... I didn't notice the word "portable". Thats what I get for jumping on the PC straight after waking up.
Souls Of Mischief is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 02:06 PM   #30
izoiva
Default Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Metis allows to shoot from the shoulder.
http://warfare.ru/db/catid/261/linkid/1663/

"The system allows delivery of fire in the prone position from organized and deployed sites, firing from the standing foxhole position as well from the shoulder, and carrying the ATGM system in packs, with pack No. 1 containing the launcher and missile in the firing attitude and pack No. 2 accommodating two Metis-M missiles."

izoiva is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
hat, kits, lat, russian
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.