|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
![]() |
Quote:
http://defensetech.org/2011/07/11/at...#ixzz1RvD6oaAg | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,000
Location: Vilnius
|
Another money dump in the already way too old and outdated tank, they couldn't make a proper He round while everyone else using same type of main gun had and instead used the crappy canister round as a substitute. Pretty sure this will go nowhere or will just end up being a sligtly better AP round, but not nearly as good as how it's described now. Or could invest into giving the Abrams proper He rounds or fix many faults on other vehicles for the money.
-snip- User received an infraction for inappropriate post content - Jigsaw |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by [R-MOD]Jigsaw; 07-13-2011 at 05:31 PM..
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,522
|
There is a multi-purpose HEAT round that already serves the functions of HEAT and HE against hard and soft targets, respectively (M830 HEAT-MP or "MPAT"). The M1028 canister round is just icing on the cake for MOUT and troops in the open. And may I ask where you form your opinion that either of these rounds are improper or crappy?
So, I'm guessing this means you want out of NATO? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,430
Location: New York City
|
Interesting read.
This is a little off-topic, but does anyone know when the US military is planning to begin phasing out the Abrams and replace it with a new MBT? I heard might not be till like 2040 or something, but it would be nice to know for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,677
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig! |
|
|
|
Last edited by [R-DEV]Bob_Marley; 07-13-2011 at 03:16 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,552
Location: The Snowy Northeast
|
First they would need a new MBT with which to replace it. At this point, its completely indeterminate
|
|
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 943
Location: AZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,000
Location: Vilnius
|
Wtf is blacktaildefence? And I just gathered the iformation from various books, internet pages and no, I don't think that the m113 is the best thing...
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by Zemciugas; 07-13-2011 at 04:21 PM..
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,430
Location: New York City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,073
Location: 3500 Feet above the Kashan Desert
|
|
|
Derpist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| abrams, ammo, atk, building, nextgen |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|