|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 613
Location: Home of jacked up trucks and Copenhagen.
|
What is the current CH-53 variant used by the Marines? Did some research but couldn't find anything..
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,473
|
They use the CH-53E Super Stallion (3 engines) in the HMH (Helicopter Marine Heavy) squadrons, but there is still one CH-53D Sea Stallion (2 engines) HMM (Helicopter Marine Medium) squadron left in K-Bay, if I remember right. All of the other HMMs are CH-46E Sea Knights (the ones that haven't converted yet to HMMTs with the Osprey).
Edit: In the future they plan to acquire the CH-53K improved Super Stallion variant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 613
Location: Home of jacked up trucks and Copenhagen.
|
ok thanks Eddie.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 943
Location: AZ
|
In 2015 they plan on integrating to the K series of CH53s I believe the USMC ordered 24... However they also plan on doing all this other stuff too so it will mostly get held back more yrs for example...
Thee programs are likely a priority for them... EFV- Almost done will field in 2012 hopefully Viper- again almost done will field in 2011 F35- almost done will field in 2012-2014 IAR- almost done 2011? M40a4- already being fielded JLTV- Hum needs replacement (joint arrangement with US Army) MPC- Need to replace aging LAVIIA2 fleet (but likely LAVs still will be in service until 2028?) M1A3 Abram- (Joint procedure with US Army for a lighter, deadlier, and more armored MBT) CH53K- Not that high on the list I would guess because of the newly acquired V22 however the new commandant is aviation so you never know what the future hold for the USMC |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() |
Quote:
The USMC has no plans to use the M1A3, instead we will take the Army's M1A2s if i understand correctly. For the same reasons stated, not a huge priority. Hope that helps. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 943
Location: AZ
|
Quote:
As for the IAR I believe it will be widely integrated in 2011 (every platoon will have one) That is what I have heard at least. | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 613
Location: Home of jacked up trucks and Copenhagen.
|
They need bigger mags for the IAR not enough rounds for suppressive full-auto.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,574
Location: The Snowy Northeast
|
Quote:
sauce I've found a few other sources regurgitating those same facts, nothing newer though. We won't be seeing the M1A3 any time soon, and if a contract is put out for the upgrades, it will be publicly announced as required by law. | |
|
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 784
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
|
Quote:
IAR's purpose, Light weight, smaller alternative to contemporaries. M249, Light Weight Machine gun, effective suppression and high reliability. You can't make up for something that's built to be from the ground up. The IAR is never going to have the sustained fire rate of the SAW, probably never going to have the prolonged reliability and long term maintainability the M249 has maintained. If weight and aging is the problem, why don't we just send a big check over the FN for a number of lightweight Mk 46s? The IAR has its advantages in the right situations, but wide spread deployment doesn't make sense. | |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 704
Location: brisbane
|
a H&K IAR was was seen by a mate of mine at TK in AVI.(he called it one of those bloody M4 thingies but his discription could only be one thing) actually he said there were several. but they were not in the hands of marines ;[ ;[. also i know for a fact they have 150rnd drum mags and are working on larger capasity ones aswell. so yes these weapons are in the field and are being used, by whom i cant say. but scan any pics of american SF in Urazgan Province and you might get lucky.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. <22:31:15> "Supahpingi": i was actually mastrubating ferosiosly to mike meyers pictures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| ch53, equipment, thread, usmc, variants |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|