Quote:
|
I'm pretty sure that the U.S. Army won't be abandoning the MBT in the near future in favor of APC's... He might be talking about Stryker brigades, which don't have MBT's included iirc.
|
After watching a report on M1s they said that Tanks wont be ruled out for many many years to come, but they did consider a Stryker with the 105m cannon to replace but with all its armor upgrades its to bulky to be deployed quick and easy like they want, if it didnt have the armor upgrades it probly would get deployed easily but surviability is what they ulitmately want which the thine armor on a stryker would just be penetrated so easily. Anyway why give up tanks there a propaganda tool used in war, don't mess with me i gotta big gun. And with the Anti missle protection system installed on tanks they will be harder to kill.
Quote:
According to Wikipedia the U.S. military still has some 6000 M1-type tanks in it's inventory, even though I don't know how many of those are actually used.
However, it would make sense for the military to reduce the amount of MBTs in favor of IFVs, considering that most of the fighting the U.S. is involved in is asymetrical in nature, where an MBT has not many appliances.
|
There is over 9000 M1s not 6000.