|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 93
|
so whats russia cooking up for its next main battle tank?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() |
T95 'Black Eagle' is apparently in the works. There are various pictures floating around the intertubes however most of them are fake, including a demonstration video which was just a T-72 with a mockup turret.
Basically from most pics its like a T90, but with a IDF Merkava-style turret, but still situated in the centre with the engine at the rear. The coolest rumor I've heard so far is that in the very front of the tank, in front of the turret which has an autoloader, there are 3 touch-screen plasmas, each with the commander, driver and gunner sitting next to eachother.. The roles can be changed around and the commander has complete control incase one crew member dies or goes unconcious etc. So theoretically the crew members can switch roles on the fly should they wish, but I highly doubt this system is even in development. And apparently, the crew is completely seperate from any other components in the tank, in a sealed area, with no contact with the weapons systems, ammunition, or engine.
|
|
Sheath no sword;
Lower no shield; Lack no vigilance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() |
note:the following info is compilations from different sites, news, forum opinions
T-90 variants for now, maybe object 195 for future one of modernizations was shown yesterday featuring new welded turret with panoramic sight, weather analyzing equipment, thermal sights Catherine-FC and Relict ERA ![]() this one is lacking IR jammers for Shtora, but detectors are there ![]() ![]() ![]() there is also more radical modernization offer Burlak, it wasn't shown to the public yet, nor it was decided which one to use supposed view of Burlak, designer is OKBTM, the one which made Black Eagle auto-loader on the back is addition to one inside, not replacement ![]() ![]() Quote:
the T index is attached to accepted tanks, otherwise they are objects, BE is object 640 about "brand new WTFBBQ tank" there were different offers from design bureaus, object 195 from UKBTM, concept of 2-man tank by Spetsmash, Black Eagle by OKBTM, object 292 by Spetsmash object 292 by Spetsmash was made in beginning of 90s, apart from loading mechanism, new turret, 152mm gun, T-80 chassis ![]() ![]() Black Eagle by OKBTM crew situated in hull and isolated from combat compartment, detachable auto-loader in the back of turret BE prototype object 195 from UKBTM this one was decided to be new MBT for RF, it wasn't shown to public yet, there are some info though that it will use 152mm gun, completely new internal layout, crew isolated in hull in armour capsule as for how it looks, there are only speculations about it like this ![]() ![]()
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 460
|
Russian tank and military engineering in general is quite brilliant, which is what one might expect when a state wastes 20 something % of GDP in useless military sector spending for 6-7 decades.
|
|
|
Last edited by Bellator; 12-09-2009 at 10:57 PM..
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 344
|
Who bothers building tanks? IFVs are the future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,201
|
cos tanks rock and can kick an IFV's ass?
oh and not exactly an MBT but the BMPT 'tank assistance vehicle' is still pretty cool nevertheless
| |||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Snowy Northeast
Posts: 7,406
|
Quote:
Anyhow, the russians have been doing some pretty crazy things with tanks, can't wait to see what they come up with. Im sure it'll be a big change from Soviet era tanks, which were based on strength through numbers, rather than technology. | |
|
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() |
Quote:
ICBM and tactical nukes can pwn almost everything, but nobody will get rid of everything else except them, because system of all arms is what matters, not single type wunderwaffe also cant say that IFVs are far more mobile than tanks, wheeled one's yes, but they are nowhere near to tanks in its armour and firepower capabilities Quote:
now lets get back to future tanks Quote:
| |||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND? |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Skane
Posts: 170
|
Here is the wikipedia link for this not-yet existing tank; T-95 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New MBT's are coming. Type 10, Japanese MBT. K2 Black Panther, South Korean. And the MİTÜP Altay from Turkey. Does anyone know (or think they know) what advantages these new tanks should have over the older tanks? New optics? Better armour? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
didnt they scrap the Black Eagle and now thier working on the T95? why is pplz saying its the same thing...or am i wrong?
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by ma21212; 12-11-2009 at 11:04 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| future, russian, tanks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|