project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > Off-Topic Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Military Technology
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Military Technology Discussion on military hardware.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2009, 08:01 PM   #21
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Quote:
Crawley Amateur Radio Club
Crawley Amateur Radio Club is a flourishing group based in Crawley, ....
RLY?

Quote:
Chemical Agent Resistant Coating
ohhhhhhhhh!

CARC - What does CARC stand for? Acronyms and abbreviations by the Free Online Dictionary.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure."
I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.
Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 12:20 AM   #22
Colonelcool125

Colonelcool125's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Eddie Baker View Post
If you look up what CARC stands for you have that reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Eddie Baker View Post
If you look up what CARC stands for you'll find out that reason.
Everyone speculating in this thread just got schooled via double post.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Don't let chafed nipples ruin your day
Words to live by.
Colonelcool125 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 03:45 AM   #23
[R-MOD]KP
Forum Moderator

[R-MOD]KP's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Eddie Baker View Post
If you look up what CARC stands for you'll find out that reason.
Canadian Arctic Resources Committee - Welcome!

Quote:
Canadian Arctic Resources Committee


But, seriously, why haven't they got that stuff in desert camo by now?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Asking you to push his girlfriend down the stairs. Well, thats just not on.
Tell him to man up and if he wants an abortion done on the cheap he'll have to do it himself.

-[R-MOD]Bob_Marley
[R-MOD]KP is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 04:14 PM   #24
Cpl.Small

Cpl.Small's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Cpl.Small
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

It'll be to do with radar or chemicals or something. tbh i'm not bothered, it's them who's gonna get seen in teh desert


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Cpl.Small is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 12:58 AM   #25
Chimpanzeeee

Chimpanzeeee's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Quote:
Mil-DTL-64159 water dispersible CARC provides for the following, in addition to its’ visual
properties and characteristics:

1. Chemical Agent Resistance
CARC provides protection against chemical and biological agents. When a tactical
vehicle is exposed to weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical or biological agents,
it must be able to be decontaminated. CARC provides this protection before and after
decontamination.

2. Signature Reduction
Key to survivability in combat is avoidance of enemy detection systems. CARC coated
vehicles and equipment have signature-reduction properties that diminish the
effectiveness of existing and emerging enemy detection systems. While infrared
reflectivity is one element of signature-reduction, others and their particulars are
considered classified information.

CARC Technical Paper


Thing I don't quite get is why just the Stryker? If the reason the Stryker is still green is that the paintjob doesn't come in any other colour/loses it's functionality when covered - suggests the Abrams, Bradleys, Gavins and other assorted vehicles don't have/need the protection it offers?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Chimpanzeeee is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 01:01 AM   #26
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

maybe they wanted to see how it holds up under prolonged combat conditions?

Or it started as incorrect paperwork that no1 could be bothered to correct?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure."
I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.
Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 12:06 AM   #27
Pariel
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd View Post
maybe they wanted to see how it holds up under prolonged combat conditions?

Or it started as incorrect paperwork that no1 could be bothered to correct?
The latter would be an amusingly likely option.
Pariel is offline Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 03:01 PM   #28
$kelet0r

$kelet0r's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

Holy thread resurrection batman!
$kelet0r is offline Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 03:09 PM   #29
[R-MOD]Cp
Forum Moderator
Project Reality Beta Tester

[R-MOD]Cp's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

"New stryker to be deployed to bases in central europe and south east asia"



just kidding


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[R-MOD]Cp is online now Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 06:41 PM   #30
Liquid_Cow

Liquid_Cow's Avatar
Default Re: Stryker camouflage

From Military.com today...

Quote:
Strykers Going Tan for Desert Look

October 26, 2009
Stars and Stripes|by Drew Brown
ZABUL PROVINCE, Afghanistan — More than six years after sending the first Stryker armored vehicles into desert combat, the Army has decided that it’s probably a good idea to start painting them tan so they will blend in with the environments in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“Safeguarding Soldiers is the primary purpose for this color change,” said U.S. Army Lt. Col. Peter Butts, commander of the 1st Battalion, 401st Army Field Support Brigade, who announced the change in a news release from Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar, earlier this month. “Strykers will blend into surroundings better. They’re less likely to stand out like silhouettes.”

Since 2003, Stryker units deploying to Iraq have done so with their vehicles painted in deep green, while most other units deployed with tan vehicles. The 5th Stryker Brigade, from Fort Lewis, Wash., which deployed to Kandahar and Zabul provinces this past summer, did so with its vehicles painted the standard color. They are the first Strykers to go into Afghanistan.

Over the years, there’s been no satisfactory answer for the difference. The Army and its contracting agencies have been talking about changing the color of the Strykers since 2004, according to Butts, “but nothing firm was planned out until now.”

“New operational direction and command guidance was pushed to make it happen,” he said, in a follow-up e-mail exchange with Stars and Stripes. “For Soldier safety, first and foremost, as well as materiel uniformity.”

Soldiers in the field will not be authorized to repaint the Strykers themselves. That can only be done in authorized facilities in Qatar, if the vehicles are sent back for repairs and retrofit, said Butts.

“The phase-out tempo will be set by unit repair and retrofit needs,” he said.

And until the Army decides to make desert tan its standard color for all Strykers, they will continue rolling off the production line in Michigan and Canada all one color: green.

“But we are starting to change the deployed units to desert tan at Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar,” Butts said.

With U.S. forces now mostly confined to their bases in Iraq and drawing down, it’s unclear how changing the color of the Strykers to tan is going to benefit those Soldiers at all. But with the war in Afghanistan heating up, Soldiers with a Stryker unit there welcomed the news — even if it has taken more than five years for the Army to make the change.

“I probably think it’s a good idea,” said Lt. Col. Burton Shields, commander of the 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, which is posted at Forward Operating Base Wolverine in Zabul province.

“We’re in the desert, so it does seem like it would blend in better with the environment.”

That sentiment was shared in the lower ranks as well, even if none of the Soldiers had ever actually seen one of the new tan vehicles.

“I wouldn’t mind it being tan,” said Pfc. Victor Pastrana, 25, of Philadelphia. “Because it would stop sticking out like a sore thumb when you’re parked up on a patrol base. It’s about time.”

Spc. Kyle Rehkamp, 21, of Covington, Ky., agreed. “I think it’d be a great improvement. It’s like he said, they stick out on operations and are easily spotted.”

Pvt. Charles Kokesh, 23, of Binghamton, N.Y., said he also believes that tan-colored Strykers would blend in better with the desert surroundings.

“There’s nothing green out here next to these mountains,” he said.

Golden Camel Alliance
Fear the Moo!!!
<MFF>
Liquid_Cow is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
camouflage, stryker
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.