|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
| View Poll Results: M-16 vs L85 | |||
| M-16 A2 |
|
37 | 42.05% |
| L85 A2 |
|
51 | 57.95% |
| Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
![]() |
The rifling is different in the Marine version of the M4A1. It's the Army who get stuck with the crap ones that have serious damage dealing issues because of the slow rounds. It's a big problem with 5.56 and short barrels, they don't fragment like they're supposed to if the muzzle velocity is too low which is why M4's are often called weak.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 448
|
the m16 is most likely easier to weld around in cqb because its counter part l85 has the bullpup design
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() |
It's generally easier to move something quicker and more accurately that's closer to your chest than something further away, which is why SMG's are almost always used by SWAT teams and what have you as they'll most likely be used in confined spaces. A Bullpup is closer to the chest than a regular rifle and is also shorter whilst having the same barrel length. It's a simple matter of physics really. An M16A2 will be vastly inferior to an L85A2 simply because of length in CQB. Try it. Use a stick or something, see which is easier and faster to aim with, a long or short one.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() |
Quote:
)
| |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() |
L85's? Kick? There's naff all to them. They're pretty well balanced, a small jolt, no more than an M16. Probably less actually because of the weight distribution and how it's supported by your body.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 889
|
And the only problem I ever had with M855 ball rounds is the fact that they are STILL too light. The round can easily change trajectory when penetrating glass. It sucks when you think you fill some guys face full of lead only to have him get shot in the ass and fall out of his car. And now we had to take care of him! ACK!
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() |
Yes, but they DO fragment above a certain velocity, which is when they are at their most lethal.
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
#40 | |||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Tested in ballistic gelatin. ![]() Quote:
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| l85a2, m16a2 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|