|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
I was searching on defense review and I came across this bullet, it is better than the 6.8x43 SPC bullet. It uses the 5.56 case so you can near perfectly fit it into to the 5.56 receiver(you just need a different barrel while the 6.8 requires different barrel plus different bolt), LMG chains, magazines etc. and it has a bit more more muzzle velocity than the 6.8 SPC.
Defense Review - 6.8x45mm Kramer Urban Combat Cartridge (UCC) for Urban Warfare Ops |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sodertalje
Posts: 5,392
|
from what i've seen incharts and heard people say, the 6.5x47 142 smk is a more stable round and more suited for assault rifles.
6.5 Grendel Fan Site :: For the 6.5 Grendel Aficionado |
|
----
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ----"You are now the AK Jesus" / Expendable Grunt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Nice to see you on the Project Reality forums Hiber, didn't know you played PR. | |
|
|
Last edited by War Man099; 09-13-2008 at 04:18 PM..
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sodertalje
Posts: 5,392
|
dunno which size it was, but one of the 6.5 versions retained its velocity very effectivly.
and yeah, been playing pr for quite some time :} |
|
----
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ----"You are now the AK Jesus" / Expendable Grunt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: carbondale
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
That being said I've got to take sides with the 6.8 on this one. the bigger the better even though most of the 6.8's out there dont shoot quite as flat as the 6.5's | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Daytona Beach Florida
Posts: 1,558
|
The 5.56 has some advantages. For example because it loses energy at an exponential rate it can actually be dropped on the top/backside of a hill or position. So while I am a big believer in the 6.5mm being the best thing since bread and the slicing thereof, the 5.56 is unique and does what its intended to do, which is less than I can say for a lot of new military technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Daytona Beach Florida
Posts: 1,558
|
Lose velocity? So... that defeats the whole point of the 6.5 MPC (the Multi Purpose Cartridge is designed to fit better on machine gun belts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bullet |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|