|
|||||||
| Military Technology : Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
United KingdomLocation: Blighty
Posts: 1,071
|
ACOG vs SUSAT
With the ACOG replacing the SUSAT for the SA80 series, what is the difference between the two? I've heard that the ACOG can be somewhat flimsy, while the SUSAT is solid as a rock, and the SUSAT uses a Tritium illuminator and the ACOG electrical/fibre optic, but I don't really know what else is different about them.
|
|
The original gun freak gaymer geek
e-penises will be put back into their owners' pants, or we'll cut them off with rusty shears. -[R-DEV]Rhino ( [R-MOD]Masaq actually -Oi, what cheeky get edited my sig? That'd be me |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() |
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Apparently in daylight the SUSAT is best when the target has a low contrast background. Maybe the ACOG this is different? The SUSAT is filled with tritium gas that has a radioactive content of 0.22 curie, its only really a therat when its broken, im guessing the ACOG dont? Found this article; Quote:
| |
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
United KingdomLocation: london
Posts: 578
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
i dont know why they are going to spend money on a new sight when the current one is working and hasnt got any noticable problems. The money should be used on more important things. Also it is very hard to let that gas out only way to do so is to brake the sight open (very hard i would imagine) and to unscrew something that has red paint that crumbles when tampered with.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up my own ar$e
Posts: 685
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
The SUSAT has been around for around 20 years and is becoming a bit dated. The gas has to be replaced every few years and the sight is heavy for what it actually does.
The new ACOG style sights have good day and night capability and apparently one also has the ability to accept a red dot for CQB which is where the SUSAT is lacking. Also the view is restricted at the bottom of the sight which although still usable can get annoying when trying to aim down wards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
i think the only reason the mod are issueing ACOG's to the sa80 is because of broken or unsalvagable susats. either way at least the MOD will stock a few for when the sa80 is put out of service in 2015, i'm more curious to know what the replacement of the sa80 will be, another bulp-up design or a more tryed and test weapon system, will the british made or get a tone of H&K 416 in..... still digging the sa80 though.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
United KingdomLocation: Blighty
Posts: 1,071
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
I think it's unlikely we'll get another British born-and-bred weapon; we simply don't have the weapons industry we used to. I'd personally hope it's another bullpup, rather than a long rifle, but that's simply because of my very heavy bias towards bullpups.
|
|
The original gun freak gaymer geek
e-penises will be put back into their owners' pants, or we'll cut them off with rusty shears. -[R-DEV]Rhino ( [R-MOD]Masaq actually -Oi, what cheeky get edited my sig? That'd be me |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
PR Developer
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England's green and pleasant lands
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
The target out of service date for SA80 was 2020, but apparently may be moved to the right by 5 years. http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/8F4E1...01_may2008.pdf
|
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 53
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
I personally prefer the ACOG over the SUSAT, I find the susat to be too distracting when aiming at long ranges, it tends to block the foreground too much.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
also note that the ACOG is picatinny standard, whilst the SUSAT has its own dove tail rail. When we eventually replace the SA80, rather have 200,000 sights that can be reused on the new weapon, instead of trying to retrofit it to a unique rail.
The ACOG retrofit doesn't remove the ability for the SA80 to use the SUSAT. They've simple slotted a cantilever rail onto the dove rail and the ACOG then sits on that (Good call if you think about it, as it removes the need to send 200,000 weapons to have the old rail removed and a picatinny added). If you want to use SUSAT, you remove the cantilever and slot the SUSAT on. Curious to know if guys on the ground will be able to choose their preference, or if private sight purchases will be allowed. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over the hills and far away in a sand pit.
Posts: 77
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Quote:
North. | |
|
God is Airborne only because he failed the commando course.
|
||
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| acog, susat |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|