|
|||||||
| Military Technology : Discussion on military hardware. |
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-22-2008, 04:07 AM
|
#11 |
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
That is indeed a good point, although I'd have thought most are rather self explanatory, and with a zero not set up for you, the difference it makes would be negligible.
What's to happen to all our LLM's then? As far as I recall they used the dove tail rail as well, so would be defunct with the new 4x front picatinny. |
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 09:56 AM
|
#12 |
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
 United KingdomLocation: In the bushes outside your house
Posts: 2,539
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
hmm i like the SA80 and bullpups... i want them to stay!!]
BTW SA80 with moar railz:  |
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by TheScot666; 06-22-2008 at 10:03 AM.
|
|
06-22-2008, 12:08 PM
|
#13 |
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
 UkraineLocation: ZomerZet, The UK/ukraine
Posts: 1,434
 |
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
SUSAT FTW every time
|
  Iorncomatose: "SuperTimo you are ridiculously britsh looking" Future 3 Sqn RAF Typhoon pilot 
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 12:16 PM
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
United KingdomLocation: In the bushes outside your house
Posts: 2,539
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Even thought that L85 with Acog and red dot supressor and bipod owns everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 12:47 PM
|
#15 |
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 678
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Is that how they will mount the ACOG's on the SA80? Cos it looks shit, too much of a gap...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
06-22-2008, 01:29 PM
|
#16 |
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
United KingdomLocation: England, Lincs
Posts: 2,608
 |
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Would the extra SUSATs be given to the TA or would they also receive the ACOG?
I would have thought that the money would be better spent on more helicopter transport etc, but if this also helps the men at the front, I cant argue with it. |
 dona nobis pacem Respect the R-Staff, they are pretty...pretty badass
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 01:43 PM
|
#17 |
|
Forum Moderator
 ![[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909's Avatar](http://www.realitymod.com/forum/uploads/avatars/avatar13535_8.gif){kind=avatar}
Join Date: Jun 2007
 United States of AmericaLocation: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,727
![Send a message via AIM to [R-MOD]Eddiereyes909](http://www.realitymod.com/forum/images/misc/im_aim.gif) |
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
IBTL, seriously guys, 'vs' threads are not allowed last time i checked.
|
  [DM]-Clan Leader |
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 01:46 PM
|
#18 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
United KingdomLocation: In the bushes outside your house
Posts: 2,539
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Meh^ dont listen to him he is a nub!! But however if it is locked, as long as this benefits the Army in a positive way, im happy tbh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 02:45 PM
|
#19 |
|
PR Public Relations
![[R-PUB]Viper5's Avatar](http://www.realitymod.com/forum/images/avatars/pr_soldiers/us_pilot.jpg)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Muther Russia
Posts: 2,312
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
I gotta agree with Morgan. Although I'd prefer the ACOG, it does look like crap mounted on the L85.
|
 Originally said by: [TG]Dirtboy "Wow. Your not cool because you quote Generation Kill. In fact, you're uncool. Yeah. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 04:13 PM
|
#20 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 678
|
Re: ACOG vs SUSAT
Quote:
Anybody know how it will be mounted or will we end up with the ridiculous space? | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| acog, susat |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
