|
|||||||
| Military Technology : Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 2,615
|
J10 video
Bottom of page (in Chinese, but you don't need to understand what they're saying).
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita.../j-10-pics.htm It really is l33t in real life, although not the way DICE put it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,367
|
Looks like an F-16 mixed with a eurofighter or saab griphon.
Nothing is "l33t" until it's combat tested, I don't think this has been in combat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 2,615
|
It's based on the Israeli Lavi, which in turn, is based on the F16I. The nose is derived from the Typhoon I think.
The main article said "it was apparent that the J-10 has the potential of becoming one of the most significant fighters in the next few decades", so that has to mean something right? They won't say that for no reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,367
|
Quote:
| |
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,836
|
i doubt china is yet on par with europe and america if it comes to aviation
also, note that the airplane only got one engine, something that is not very popular for fighters (was/is a big point of criticism about the f-35) |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 2,615
|
F16s only have 1 engine and they are some of the best fighters around. J-10s have pretty much the same role. Also, stealth is just the "in" thing right now, there are other methods to improve combat capability, or get an advantage over your opponent so you don't need better combat capability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 803
|
Lol I could see a sidewinder taking that one out
Personally I would fly that beautiful j 10 |
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
It doesn't have a lot of lift since it landed at high speed and had to use a parachute to come to a halt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,836
|
Quote:
the f-16 lost in a competitiv bidding to the f-15, which is a two-engine plane. it was only used that much since it was a lot cheaper - kinda like the f-22 (two-seater) will be used much less than the cheaper f-35. stealth is a very important aspect in todays aviation, and basically, to outweight or at least balance stealth the j-10 would need (in comparison to the f-22) some knd of uber-radar, which the airplane doesnt appear to have. also, it is not as fast as other modern fighters) still, itīs basically the first fighter china ever produced themselves - but they still have a long way to go, seeing as how many technolgies had to be "borrowed" from other states (russia,israel,...) | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 2,615
|
Ok, what does the US Armed Forces rely on in combat the most? Electronics right? I'm sure you've heard of the satellite blinding technology that China possesses now, as well as blinding technology for any detection device, so if US satellites are down, or even if the US planes' electronics are disabled even for a minute, that could mean big trouble for the planes in the field, stealth or no stealth. There would have to be cooperation from ground stations. And I'm willing to bet that's not the only trick the PLA has up its sleeve.
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| j10, video |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|