|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Military Technology Discussion on military hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | ||||
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
also, china would first need to find all the satellites, something that is not that easy, and secondary, satellites are not vital for an f-22 to lock on to an airplane also, what do you exactly mean with "relies on electronics most"? Quote:
also, well, even if they could blind any detection device, they couldnt counter the stealth capability Quote:
Quote:
1) f-22 flies in chinese airspace to hit a vital target. china manages somehow, to block the f-22´s radar with electronic countermeasures for lets say 10 minutes. to counter the f-22s eccm countermeasures, the chinese could jamm basically all available frequences, so that their own radars become usless, but lets just say they dont and it really works, the f-22 has no radar (remember, this probably wouldnt happen, because they most likely wouldnt even know that there would be an f-22) for 10 minutes. but that´s it, they still wouldnt know where the plane is and even if they´ve managed to come close with a j-10, the f-22 could easily outrun it (provided it would notice the j-10). 2) a j-10 enters american airspace, to hit a vital target. the plane isnt´t equipped with any kind of stealth technology. 2.1) it would easily be registered and destroyed 2.2) it would be equipped with massive ecm techology, but i doubt it could counter an awacs plane or so -> china losses i think youre overestamating chinas capablities a bit ^_^ | ||||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 800
|
Lol Griffon and Dunk drop it before it gets there. Almost gettiing into a our plane is better than yours.
It is quite an accomplishment for China as first modern fighter built by them. Hey it is also viewed as Uber for vaniller players |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
China did nothing new here. They took an existing product, copied the design and made them cheaper than anyone else can. I wouldn't be surprised if their failure rate is 4 times that of equivalent US F-16.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
i never ment to start some kind of "z0/\/\g teh -j10 is teh 5ucks" thread - i just wanted to point out that the plane is clearly inferior to western air superiority fighters - but still, i give china credit for the j-10, basically their first modern fighter ever - just that they used a lot of foreign technology (engine, radar and so on) Quote:
| ||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
to put simply US/Europe owns China = gets owned Thats is until their Quote:
| ||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,812
|
lol, arent you s r-mod supposed NOT to spamm
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 2,487
|
No, trogdor, Wolfmaster, Dylan, they all spam. Maybe that's why trogdor's not a MOD anymore.
And when do you see Europe in C&C Generals? |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Under normal circumstances, everybody pwns Griffon, in Soviet Russia, Griffon pwns EVERYBODY! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| j10, video |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|