Go Back   Project Reality Forums > Off-Topic Forums > Military Technology
Military Technology : Discussion on military hardware.

Welcome to the Project Reality Forums! Join the Project Reality forums! Contact Us


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2007, 06:10 AM   #1

brbllrd's Avatar
Holding M-16's / M4's (A Question)

I see people holding M-16's (or M-4's) in different ways - sometimes they put one hand on the trigger handle and the other under the barrrel; other times they put one hand on the trigger handle and the other in front of the clip. I know why they keep the hand on the trigger handle - the gun won't shoot otherwise. Are there situations where soldiers use the "under the barrel" grip versus the other one, or is it just individual preference?

Thanks!
brbllrd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:37 AM   #2
PR Contributor

[R-CON]MikeAP's Avatar
Its all about keeping the weapon stable against your body. Neither way is wrong. And yes, it is just a preference.

To be honest. I prefer using a combat grip for this reason alone, however in the absense of the foward combat grip I use the magazine method.


Me and my men - Baghdad 07'
[R-CON]MikeAP is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 04:04 PM   #3
Retired PR Developer

A.J.Sawyer's Avatar
I know its not Real as such, but when I go Airsofting, I use the magazine method aswell, far more comfortable.


Thanks Nick.
A.J.Sawyer is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 06:12 PM   #4

brbllrd's Avatar
Thanks!
brbllrd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 06:59 PM   #5

=SE=N@poleone's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to =SE=N@poleone
I think that for M4 maybe possible hold the rifle with the magazine(anyway not suggested...you can accidentally move it and do a malfuction in the reloading system or loose some gas needed at recharge the breechblock)...but never mind to use that "grip" with a real M16,dont forget that the hand in the trigger handle is only for shoot...the other one has the job to support the entire weapon that weight 4 kilos and,overall,1 meter long(the two hands are too much near for can keep the weapon balanced).

For private shooting mighty it's a confort preference(?) but i dont belive that you shoot under the Army with the magazine method the major sergent is very happy.


Screaming Eagles
=SE=N@poleone is offline Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-23-2007, 08:09 PM   #6

Agent Johnson's Avatar
the magazine method works very good for me. i like it more than the foward grip because its more stable.

Agent Johnson is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:29 PM   #7

Skinwehr's Avatar
I resist the temptation to hold the magazine. At least on the 16's you can rest your hand on the magazine well instead of the mag itself. What =SE=N@poleone said is exactly why it isn't the best way to hold any firearm by its box. There's a good chance of feeding problems when you hold it like that.

"A true warrior fights not because he hates what is in front of him; A true warrior fights because he loves what is behind him" -Saga
Skinwehr is offline Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 09:11 PM   #8

D_LaMz's Avatar
Many people don't hold on to the magazine its self, but really the magazine well. I would rather hold on to the forearm than the mag well, but people hold on to the mag well because the bolt release is really close to the mag well.
D_LaMz is offline Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Bookmarks

Tags
holding, m16, question
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2008, Project Reality.