[Vehicle] M1A1 AIM - Page 4

Solid Knight · 07-10-2009, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilsonPL

Looks good, i cant wait to see Austrian army in PR

They lost the first World War.

[R-DEV]Tonnie · 07-10-2009, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anglomanii

what weapon does the commander get on this vehicle.
and if so can we please do it right and have it buttoned up like in reality, and the commander using his protected weapon station optics.

What???? lol its a tank

anglomanii · 07-10-2009, 04:32 AM

thats what i mean, on every other tank in PR has the commander exposed, is this how its meant to be?

Proff3ssorXman · 07-10-2009, 10:06 PM

Thats because in PR, there isn't any actual 'Commander' position as such.

Sure he gets a .50cal, but that's it. The driver gets the Commander's periscope so there isn't an actual need for the commander.

anglomanii · 07-10-2009, 11:37 PM

well there bloody well should be.
its just not realistic too have a black hat sticking his fang box out for some goat jockey to stick a flippin lead nut into it. and from my experience a spam can needs all the eyes it can get, it also helps in so many more ways, and frankly thats how it operates in the real world.
but then that's just me now isn't it?

TempesT · 07-11-2009, 03:55 AM

There is a 64 player limit on PR servers. You simply cannot afford to have more players taken from other roles to ones that are less essential, such as a commander spot in a tank. Fun has to be just as important a factor as realism.

anglomanii · 07-11-2009, 05:19 AM

i can see your point,
i dont "want" to agree with it, but i guess this has all been discussed before.
if we went for true realism the PLA would have millions of tickets, the american's would have 10 second breaks between artillery, the poms would use Phuc as every second word and the french wouldn't show up.
so i can see what your on about.
i just figured if you did have a third person on board they might as well be properly useful.

[R-DEV]Tonnie · 07-11-2009, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anglomanii

i can see your point,
i dont "want" to agree with it, but i guess this has all been discussed before.
if we went for true realism the PLA would have millions of tickets, the american's would have 10 second breaks between artillery, the poms would use Phuc as every second word and the french wouldn't show up.
so i can see what your on about.
i just figured if you did have a third person on board they might as well be properly useful.

HAHAAHA yeah so true...

dtacs · 01-06-2010, 10:21 AM

According to what pictures of the 1 Armored Abrams' I could find, the M1A1 AIM doesn't use a commander's CITV which is only present on M1A2's. I assume it is staying on the model for practical reasons?

TBH the driver's hole should simply use the periscopes that are already there, for realisms sake.

Gu^n3r · 01-07-2010, 07:38 AM

FYI: New M1A1 barracuda camoflauge(was a low res picture posted before but thought we need some more to show it off abit more)

Source: Military vehicle camouflage | Ben and Camera

07-10-2009, 04:32 AM	#33
anglomanii Join Date: Dec 2008 Australia Location: brisbane Posts: 710	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM thats what i mean, on every other tank in PR has the commander exposed, is this how its meant to be?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. <22:31:15> "Supahpingi": i was actually mastrubating ferosiosly to mike meyers pictures

07-10-2009, 10:06 PM	#34
Proff3ssorXman Join Date: Mar 2008 Australia Location: QLD - Australia Posts: 383	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM Thats because in PR, there isn't any actual 'Commander' position as such. Sure he gets a .50cal, but that's it. The driver gets the Commander's periscope so there isn't an actual need for the commander.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

07-10-2009, 11:37 PM	#35
anglomanii Join Date: Dec 2008 Australia Location: brisbane Posts: 710	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM well there bloody well should be. its just not realistic too have a black hat sticking his fang box out for some goat jockey to stick a flippin lead nut into it. and from my experience a spam can needs all the eyes it can get, it also helps in so many more ways, and frankly thats how it operates in the real world. but then that's just me now isn't it?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. <22:31:15> "Supahpingi": i was actually mastrubating ferosiosly to mike meyers pictures

07-11-2009, 03:55 AM	#36
TempesT Join Date: Apr 2009 Australia Location: Sydney Posts: 155	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM There is a 64 player limit on PR servers. You simply cannot afford to have more players taken from other roles to ones that are less essential, such as a commander spot in a tank. Fun has to be just as important a factor as realism.

07-11-2009, 05:19 AM	#37
anglomanii Join Date: Dec 2008 Australia Location: brisbane Posts: 710	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM i can see your point, i dont "want" to agree with it, but i guess this has all been discussed before. if we went for true realism the PLA would have millions of tickets, the american's would have 10 second breaks between artillery, the poms would use Phuc as every second word and the french wouldn't show up. so i can see what your on about. i just figured if you did have a third person on board they might as well be properly useful.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. <22:31:15> "Supahpingi": i was actually mastrubating ferosiosly to mike meyers pictures

01-06-2010, 10:21 AM	#39
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Australia Posts: 5,071	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM According to what pictures of the 1 Armored Abrams' I could find, the M1A1 AIM doesn't use a commander's CITV which is only present on M1A2's. I assume it is staying on the model for practical reasons? TBH the driver's hole should simply use the periscopes that are already there, for realisms sake.
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Australia Posts: 5,071	Sheath no sword; Lower no shield; Lack no vigilance.

01-07-2010, 07:38 AM	#40
Gu^n3r Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Australia Location: Grid: 56J 553994 6884209 Posts: 252	Re: [Vehicle] M1A1 AIM FYI: New M1A1 barracuda camoflauge(was a low res picture posted before but thought we need some more to show it off abit more) Source: Military vehicle camouflage \| Ben and Camera
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Translator: "He's not a bad man.." Soldier: "He's not a bad man? he's got a BOMB strapped to him!"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links