[Weapon] F88 Aus Styer

[Chanvlan]

ahahah yeh

[[R-CON]nedlands1]

Originally Posted by Sgt.Trip

but for the purpose of a game its gonna have to be a button we press to change the rate of fire!


cause we can't make a half mouse click be semi and a full mouse click be auto.... not gonna work... :P

There are two options that I can think of. The first one is just having an automatic firemode which will force players to lightly tap their mouses to shoot single shots. The other option is having both single shot and automatic but no sound or animation for changing between the two.

[Shotgun]

that sounds like a good idea

[catwaterboy]

woo what a crazy trigger :P

[Sgt.Trip]

Originally Posted by [R-CON]nedlands1

The first one is just having an automatic firemode which will force players to lightly tap their mouses to shoot single shots.

+1 for this idea

[triggerhappY|PR]

Originally Posted by [R-CON]nedlands1

No. Ideally it would be the heavy barrelled version with the bipod not unlike the L86A2 LSW.

yeah the marksman rifle should be Styer AUG LSW as its known, with bipod, longer barrel and ACOG scope, similar to what the L86A2 LSW is to the standard L85A2 btw anyone considered the AICW? google it and hava look

[Truism]

Originally Posted by triggerhappY|PR

yeah the marksman rifle should be Styer AUG LSW as its known, with bipod, longer barrel and ACOG scope, similar to what the L86A2 LSW is to the standard L85A2 btw anyone considered the AICW? google it and hava look

Does the Australian Army even use the F88 LSW? If so, who is issued it?
No one is yet issued with the AICW, and likely won't be for quite a while.

If I may be so bold, I suggest that the ADF faction doesn't have a Marksman class, but instead has a Signaller class who could function like a cross between a Spec Operator and a Rifleman, using a piece of equipment to allow the universal reporting of enemy assets, and some limited target designation (for area attacks and maybe even airstrikes from Tigers and Hornets).

Not having Signallers in an ADF faction just seems... Odd given their incredible importance in ADF doctrine, and the apparent absence of specially Designated Marksmen....

[[R-CON]tonnie15]

Originally Posted by Truism

Not having Signallers in an ADF faction just seems... Odd given their incredible importance in ADF doctrine, and the apparent absence of specially Designated Marksmen....

YES lol i am not the only one who thinks this lol (maybe a little bi est tho lol)

[ReadMenace]

Originally Posted by Truism

Not having Signallers in an ADF faction just seems... Odd given their incredible importance in ADF doctrine, and the apparent absence of specially Designated Marksmen....

I'm not sure exactly what a signaller is, but I'm assuming that it's a soldier dedicated to radio communications. Would it be possible to separate the SL's ability to lay rallies from their ability to talk w/ the CO?

-REad

[[R-CON]tonnie15]

i believe its hardcoded not sure