[Weapon] MG3

[[R-CON]marcoelnk]

i wouldnt say fat ...just a bit too short imo

[~XHW~Flamestorm]

indeed looks to short but nice

[[R-CON]azn_chopsticks_boi]

Could just be the angle of the weapon in the shot.

[[R-CON]Z-trooper]

it looks like it was rendered from a "user" viewport... it gives it a funny angle look sometimes. if it is, try rendering it from a "perspective" viewport gumball..

But I assume he has modeled it from a reference photo and to the people saying its too short, try looking at some of the other renders he has done - does it look too short there? my guess is that he hasnt changed it since, so if the other renders are good, well then there is no more need to comment on it.

[agentscar]

I'm pretty sure,the Bundeswehr uses the MG4 now,as their platoon level MG,and infantry MG...MG3 may still be used in some cases...

BUT ANYWAYS,That thing looks nice,I don't think it's too short,or too fat...

[[R-CON]azn_chopsticks_boi]

You are correct in the Bundeswehr using the Mg4, thats why there is a Mg4 being made. But the MG4 was never made to replace the Mg3, the Mg3 is still use at the GPMG. We need the Mg3 for the Leopard 2A6, Wolf, Dingo, Boxer and etc.

[gumball]

those are 2 extras i have laying around

sorry for that bad angle, here is the left side of it



hope that should help

[Brummy]

Gumballtastic

[[R-CON]marcoelnk]

NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICEEEE!

[[R-CON]Z-trooper]

nice stuff dude I'm sure people will appriciate that model since a lot of factions will be using it