[Audit] Strike At Karkand - Page 7

[R-CON]Z-trooper · 10-22-2007, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]Hfett

I got an idea for sharqui also AAS

karkand will be fine since the flag layout will be diferent

But imo the best map will be the one that im making for HamasXIdf =)

cant wait to see that map

H3eadshot · 10-22-2007, 04:59 PM

I realize you tried to make the map bigger for PR but the mountains are serving pretty much no purpose. The way they are angled aswell makes them useless for cover. How about adding several valleys for which to travel through and flank found the city. They would be narrow and resemble dried up rivers or something similiar with rocks on the ground so no vehicles could pass, only inf. This would create less of a distinctive "frontline" which ruined even BF2v games.

[R-CON]Hfett · 10-22-2007, 05:08 PM

Cannot modify the terrain on a vanilla map audit

jayceon515 · 10-22-2007, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]Hfett

I got an idea for sharqui also AAS

karkand will be fine since the flag layout will be diferent

But imo the best map will be the one that im making for HamasXIdf =)

If you manage to make that map for 0.7 then we don't need more maps for IDF vs Hamas for now since this is a community faction and having 3 or more maps for it just wouldn't be fair if we take in mind that there are still other PR made factions to come + new maps. Make that map as good as you can and we can all forget about those vBF2 crappy maps

youm0nt · 10-22-2007, 07:01 PM

How about an audit for Road to Jalalabad?

[R-DEV]bosco · 10-22-2007, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youm0nt

How about an audit for Road to Jalalabad?

Indeed, that would be interesting to see.

jayceon515 · 10-22-2007, 07:45 PM

City area is IMO way too small for PR standards. It could be interesting for CF vs insurgents on infantry only with just CF light transport.

[R-CON]Hfett · 10-22-2007, 08:04 PM

Yeah, jalalabad is to small

could be used for a map like Street

10-22-2007, 04:59 PM	#62
H3eadshot Join Date: May 2007 United Kingdom Location: Edinburgh Posts: 834	I realize you tried to make the map bigger for PR but the mountains are serving pretty much no purpose. The way they are angled aswell makes them useless for cover. How about adding several valleys for which to travel through and flank found the city. They would be narrow and resemble dried up rivers or something similiar with rocks on the ground so no vehicles could pass, only inf. This would create less of a distinctive "frontline" which ruined even BF2v games.
	"So tell me just how come were the Taliban Sat burning incense in Texas Roaming round in a Lexus Sittin’ on six billion oil drums Down with the Dow Jones, up on the Nasdaq Pushed into the war zones." Ingame: <1sk>Headshot

10-22-2007, 05:08 PM	#63
[R-CON]Hfett PR Contributor Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Brazil Posts: 1,420	Cannot modify the terrain on a vanilla map audit
	Click on my sig to visit the brazilian PR community!

10-22-2007, 07:01 PM	#65
youm0nt Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,649	How about an audit for Road to Jalalabad?
youm0nt Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,649	(o,o) \|)__) -"-"- O RLY?

10-22-2007, 08:04 PM	#68
[R-CON]Hfett PR Contributor Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Brazil Posts: 1,420	Yeah, jalalabad is to small could be used for a map like Street
	Click on my sig to visit the brazilian PR community!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-22-2007, 07:45 PM	#67
jayceon515 Join Date: Jul 2007 Iraq Location: Sadr city, Baghdad Posts: 449	City area is IMO way too small for PR standards. It could be interesting for CF vs insurgents on infantry only with just CF light transport.

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links