Ballistcs or Tracers? - Page 3

milobr · 07-31-2008, 01:40 AM

This is a though choice to make.

I'd go for no tracers at all. I thought about "keep the bug" options but then it came to my mind that I rely just too much on tracers to aim correctly and even though tracer bullets don't behave like normal ones, the difference in case is just too much.

In this case, I'd go for the REALITY upon gameplay.

[R-COM]TheScot666 · 07-31-2008, 05:40 AM

Keep the tracer bug, to an extent it's a bit more realistic, and 55cm at 300 m on a human body(in game whatever) wont make a huge difference in my eyes, ALSO with the refinement of the Suppression effect(I think) it should make it better.

cyberzomby · 07-31-2008, 05:47 AM

Yea cant you make a movie with the different solutions. I'd really want to see this before I make up my mind.

Right now I'd say: get it with tracers. If its not really that noticeable keep it in. We need tracers for aiming.

General_J0k3r · 07-31-2008, 07:28 AM

we need tracers especially to direct fire
what would i do as SL if i couldn't scream "NME SQUAD, WATCH MY TRACERS" in VOIP?

Jonny · 07-31-2008, 07:37 AM

SL could be given tracers, just for this purpose.

My solution would be #1 for ground troops, but ALL vehicle based weapons loose all or almost all drop and keep a uitable number of tracers. Auto rifleman would need testing to find which category it fits into though.

IMO loosing tracers for almost all rifles allows you to hide more easily.

cyberzomby · 07-31-2008, 07:46 AM

Yes but thats part of the reality program. Not opening fire when your not sure when you can make the kill. If your just shooting at the enemy and the chance of hitting is very slim, the enemy will discover your position. But if you waited longer for them to move closer you could have killed them and stayed unnoticed

gazzthompson · 07-31-2008, 08:53 AM

i voted keep tracer bug, and agree maybe slightly reduce amount of tracer rounds for rifleman. but what ever happens we need ballistics in PR

Tirak · 07-31-2008, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonny

SL could be given tracers, just for this purpose.

My solution would be #1 for ground troops, but ALL vehicle based weapons loose all or almost all drop and keep a uitable number of tracers. Auto rifleman would need testing to find which category it fits into though.

IMO loosing tracers for almost all rifles allows you to hide more easily.

This in my mind is a reason to keep Tracers, one of the advantages of certain kits and of the Militia and Insurgents is that they have no tracers and can more easily ambush their enemy and retreat before their positions been discovered.

AnRK · 07-31-2008, 10:42 AM

I seriously can't believe 2 people chose no ballistics. I'm no Commie, but they should be tracked down and banned from PR

Good work though lads, been trying to follow your progress in the community section, and not understood a word of it. Looks like you've put alot of effort in however.

Jonny · 07-31-2008, 10:52 AM

Just wait till I prove Rhino's bridge from OGT doesn't hold its own weight....

Should only take a year or two @ cambridge to learn the maths for that.

View Poll Results: out of these options what do you feel is best?
All or Nothing	94	27.17%
No tracers at all	40	11.56%
keep the tracer bug	191	55.20%
no ballistics	21	6.07%
Voters: 346. You may not vote on this poll

07-31-2008, 01:40 AM	#21
milobr Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 390	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? This is a though choice to make. I'd go for no tracers at all. I thought about "keep the bug" options but then it came to my mind that I rely just too much on tracers to aim correctly and even though tracer bullets don't behave like normal ones, the difference in case is just too much. In this case, I'd go for the REALITY upon gameplay.
milobr Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 390	Click on my sig to visit the brazilian PR community!

07-31-2008, 05:40 AM	#22
[R-COM]TheScot666 PR Community Event Team Join Date: Jan 2008 United Kingdom Location: In the bushes outside your house Posts: 3,976	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? Keep the tracer bug, to an extent it's a bit more realistic, and 55cm at 300 m on a human body(in game whatever) wont make a huge difference in my eyes, ALSO with the refinement of the Suppression effect(I think) it should make it better.
	Lest we forget. R-DEV Masaq- I'm such a dork. Rudd - You should run for Prime Minister! i'd vote for you Sgt.Smeg - You've the biggest I've seen Scot.

07-31-2008, 05:47 AM	#23
cyberzomby Join Date: Apr 2007 Netherlands Posts: 648	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? Yea cant you make a movie with the different solutions. I'd really want to see this before I make up my mind. Right now I'd say: get it with tracers. If its not really that noticeable keep it in. We need tracers for aiming.
cyberzomby Join Date: Apr 2007 Netherlands Posts: 648

07-31-2008, 07:28 AM	#24
General_J0k3r Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Berlin Fhain Posts: 1,203	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? we need tracers especially to direct fire what would i do as SL if i couldn't scream "NME SQUAD, WATCH MY TRACERS" in VOIP?

07-31-2008, 07:37 AM	#25
Jonny Join Date: Apr 2007 United Kingdom Location: Peterhouse college, Cambridge Posts: 2,666	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? SL could be given tracers, just for this purpose. My solution would be #1 for ground troops, but ALL vehicle based weapons loose all or almost all drop and keep a uitable number of tracers. Auto rifleman would need testing to find which category it fits into though. IMO loosing tracers for almost all rifles allows you to hide more easily.
	Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!

07-31-2008, 07:46 AM	#26
cyberzomby Join Date: Apr 2007 Netherlands Posts: 648	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? Yes but thats part of the reality program. Not opening fire when your not sure when you can make the kill. If your just shooting at the enemy and the chance of hitting is very slim, the enemy will discover your position. But if you waited longer for them to move closer you could have killed them and stayed unnoticed
cyberzomby Join Date: Apr 2007 Netherlands Posts: 648

07-31-2008, 08:53 AM	#27
gazzthompson Join Date: Jan 2007 United Kingdom Location: norfolk Posts: 2,391	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? i voted keep tracer bug, and agree maybe slightly reduce amount of tracer rounds for rifleman. but what ever happens we need ballistics in PR

07-31-2008, 10:42 AM	#29
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 United Kingdom Location: Near Leeds Posts: 1,501	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? I seriously can't believe 2 people chose no ballistics. I'm no Commie, but they should be tracked down and banned from PR Good work though lads, been trying to follow your progress in the community section, and not understood a word of it. Looks like you've put alot of effort in however.
	I'm a PC! And I use a badly written Microsoft operating system like the vast majority of PC users thus discrediting your individuality based retaliation to Apple marketing.

07-31-2008, 10:52 AM	#30
Jonny Join Date: Apr 2007 United Kingdom Location: Peterhouse college, Cambridge Posts: 2,666	Re: Ballistcs or Tracers? Just wait till I prove Rhino's bridge from OGT doesn't hold its own weight.... Should only take a year or two @ cambridge to learn the maths for that.
	Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links