|
|||||||
| PR Suggestions : Suggestions from our community members. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 98
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
Quote:
Might as well attach a gun to a bus or a truck. Would do the same job much cheaper.. I dont think it matters much what round a modern MBT fires at the APC. It will be toast anyway.... | |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
PR Artwork Team
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,588
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
All true. They put armor on the APC's and IFV's to protect its occupants from small arms fire and provide some protection against mines and rockets. Also keep in mind that although rockets and small arms are easy to carry and shoot, .50 caliber weapons must be mounted on vehicles or emplaced, which is why APC's and the like don't need to be armored to withstand them. In the current theatre against an insurgency, it is unlikely that they would get ahold of these weapons nevermind use them effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() |
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
The Rifled Cannon of the Challenger will be gone @ 2009-2010.
Its ineffective against modern armor. The Rifled Cannon has a good long range ability, but not enough power. The new Cannon will be the same like the one of Abrams and Leopard 2 manufactured under License by Rheinmetall Ger. The Heat Round in RL are very effective @ long Range distances, cause it dont needs kenetic energy to penetrate Armor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
CanadaPosts: 434
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
it also depends on what kind of sabot round you're using, depleted uranium rounds, everyone is dead. and if i do recal a light AT round kills an APC no problem so if your HAT rounds arnt killing theres a problem either with your shooting or your comp.
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
CanadaPosts: 434
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
Quote:
| |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#26 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
NorwayLocation: Norway
Posts: 2,947
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
If a SABOT round goes though a vehicle, everyone in it wont die... And im talking about HEAT rounds in tank, not the HAT kit.
|
|
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience
Killing for peace is like f*cking for virginity I Jaymz
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over the hills and far away in a sand pit.
Posts: 77
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
So why does the Challenger with its ineffective rifled barrel have one of, if not the longest tank to tank kill in history ?
|
|
God is Airborne only because he failed the commando course.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over the hills and far away in a sand pit.
Posts: 77
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
Quote:
Army Technology - APFSDS - Ammunition Scroll down to LONG RANGE TANK GUNNERY Answers? The British Challenger 2 is getting a new barrel, not for lack of performance, but to simplify the supply chain, and allow use of NATO STANDARD ammunition, ie then we can scrounge it from our American Cousins, as our Governments to CHEAP to pay for our own | |
|
God is Airborne only because he failed the commando course.
|
||
|
|
|
#29 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 205
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 377
|
Re: HEAT damage boost vs APCs
The round is not HEAT its is HEI-T (High Explosive insendary- Tracer) I think thats when the other shell is in the tanks
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by GR34; 07-26-2008 at 11:49 PM.
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| apcs, boost, damage, heat |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|