|
|||||||
| PR Suggestions : Suggestions from our community members. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#51 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
United KingdomLocation: Peterhouse college, Cambridge
Posts: 2,666
|
A heli can kill a tank from 8km, over a hill. Dont even have maps that big in PR.
With air superiority the helis are not there to hit, and yours knnow where the hostile armour is so can stay well away. Heli based weapon systems allow you to find hiden tanks and destroy them without getting close, so you know exactly where thay are and dont need to fly into range of their main cannon. Training teaches the pilots to use the terrain to hide, unlike what you normally see in PR. |
|
Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
what if the target is in the air....and moving....therefore having to be led? If you are leading an air-target....you are pointing off into the "blue"....how can a range be lazed if you have nothing for the lazer to bounce off of? | |
|
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
|
||
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
MontserratPosts: 1,581
|
The tank is good at AA because the shell should drop 6.5m during flight but doesnt drop at all also the turret movement and firing is instant.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
United KingdomLocation: Peterhouse college, Cambridge
Posts: 2,666
|
I get 2.2m, not 6.5
Balistics computer is to lead target. You lase the heli, computer calculates lead and elevation. You do NOT manually lead when a computer can do a better job of it. How far the shell drops is irrelevant, due to the computer. Lead should be irrelevant, due to the computer. Because of this the tanks are actually underpowered, and I demand infinately fast shells to simulate the calculations done by computer. |
|
Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
MontserratPosts: 1,581
|
60% of 10 basically?
Yea the computer cures all ills but the turret moves too fast if they (could) put in the drop I'd be happy tbh |
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#56 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
United KingdomLocation: Peterhouse college, Cambridge
Posts: 2,666
|
not 60% of 10, use s=ut+1/2at^2, you get 0.5*9.8*2/3*2/3, or 9.8*2/9. When firing horizontally and ignoring drag.
The only map that should actually have helicopters or planes is really the 8x8 km remake of wake island. I dont know if it will ever be included in PR though. Anything else is way too small. |
|
Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
MontserratPosts: 1,581
|
Which equation is that? Its only 2 metres then but enough to muddy the waters hopefully, I do think kashan with its view distance is lobsided in its realism because of this factor maybe, or whatever it is it does not play right. Maybe it needs heat haze or something to make it less 'perfect'
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#58 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
United KingdomLocation: Peterhouse college, Cambridge
Posts: 2,666
|
thats a constant acceleration equation.
adding the drop would mean a hell of a lot of python coding to dynamically zero the gun, which I am not sure is possible, and would lead to a nice effect and the same result as getting rid of the drop. So its not worth adding unless I find a lot of time and a way to do it in the summer after my A2 exams. The problem with kashan is the view distance, its way too small and should be around 2km with the bf2 fog evenly distributed instead of starting at 700m and ending at 980m. Just look at the fog on fools road, it looks a lot better because of it starting at 0m. The planes need to be removed from kashan, too, and the max altitude for helicopters needs to be well within the view distance. I would also say it needs to be remade with an 8x8km map using statics for the majority of the terrain and more tanks, which should be used as infantry and APCs scouting on the 64 size, dropping down to apcs being the main force and jeeps scouting on the 32 size map. |
|
Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
MontserratPosts: 1,581
|
opps basic equation, think I remember it from like 20 years ago, roughly
Quote:
| |
![]() |
||
|
|
|
#60 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
United KingdomLocation: Peterhouse college, Cambridge
Posts: 2,666
|
see, its good enough for you to not even notice it.
I can look out of my windom and see hills in the distance with the same kind of effect, they slowly fade out of view because of the atmosphere. I can see a lot further but the effect is the same. |
|
Ballistics + Zeroing !!!Nedlands1 for [R-CON]!!! (Done) !!!Nedlands1 for [R-DEV]!!!
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bullet, cal, drop, tank or apc or 50 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|