|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,596
Location: Viking Stronghold.
|
I bet that we have all tried to be killed as infantry by a stationary TOW. The fact is that these missiles should be used to fight armor, and not as a stationary sniper kit.
I belive that if the amount of ammo was reduced from 9 to atleast 3 or 2, that it would still be enough to defend your firebase from tanks & apcs, along with making you think twice before engaging riflemen with an expensive AT weapon. Thoughts? I apologize if I am resuggesting, didnt find any resaults on search engine. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 457
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
|
Last edited by Ford_Jam; 06-06-2010 at 08:13 PM..
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 182
Location: Ohio
|
it is a resuggestion but I'm all for it. If not reduce the ammo, than at least the reloading time but less ammo sounds better imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,596
Location: Viking Stronghold.
|
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 457
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,596
Location: Viking Stronghold.
|
Quote:
But yeah, Fess elaborates it in a more detailed way | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| ammo, reduce, tow |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|