Alternate Deployable Assets - Page 2

Ghost1800 · 06-02-2010, 06:27 AM

Bringing back the old style foxholes that go all the way around but require to jump in would be pretty nice as an alternative to the one where it leaves your back exposed. Would be a lot more helpful during a mortar/artillery strike.

killonsight95 · 06-02-2010, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghost1800

Bringing back the old style foxholes that go all the way around but require to jump in would be pretty nice as an alternative to the one where it leaves your back exposed. Would be a lot more helpful during a mortar/artillery strike.

nah cuz they're hard to get into sometimes and hard to get out, i say bring in a one sided foxhole type thing with a roof for protection.

pl0x102 · 06-02-2010, 08:13 AM

Sounds pretty good

illidur · 06-02-2010, 01:22 PM

i think an insurgent roadblock built near hideouts or caches would be awsome. but instead of wire it needs to be on fire. ( the idea is from ramiel ) i am against lots of deployables for insurgents but i think having one kind would add to insurgency. this would serve the purpose of area denial rather than extra defense.

Commando_Jenkins · 06-02-2010, 01:36 PM

I agree the insurgent forces need some kind of deployable where they can 'Re-Route' the Blufor. But it might become to OP if they are able to place them in caves, or one way cache locations. Unless, they can be burned with thermite.

Jonny · 06-02-2010, 02:06 PM

I think its one of several things that needs to be looked at again.

=]H[= JakCurse · 06-02-2010, 02:29 PM

Perhaps engineer it so that if sandbags are placed there's NO tank traps, to offset the value and make them significantly different. But yeah, great idea.

myles · 06-02-2010, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zrix

Well, you can run down the static concrete road blocks with cars, so something similar should be applicable to buildable stuff. Maybe.

if you just make it you have to go at a slower speed to bash them down than a wall im sure it could wrk

Maniac302 · 08-20-2010, 03:57 AM

I'd like to see versions of the buildable TOWs and AAs with higher sandbag walls around them, in cases where you don't need to shoot down, but want better small arms fire protection for the operator.

Operator009 · 08-20-2010, 10:16 PM

Don't insurgents use mortars IRL? I remember US bases get mortar'ed all the time at the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom.

06-02-2010, 06:27 AM	#11
Ghost1800 Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,375 United States of America	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets Bringing back the old style foxholes that go all the way around but require to jump in would be pretty nice as an alternative to the one where it leaves your back exposed. Would be a lot more helpful during a mortar/artillery strike.
	"Every time there is any flying vehicle on a map, most people turn retarded." - SJT "jesus christ thats not a To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. thats an essay with a picture attached lol" - unrealalex

06-02-2010, 08:13 AM	#13
pl0x102 Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 30 United Kingdom Location: Northolt,London	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets Sounds pretty good

06-02-2010, 01:22 PM	#14
illidur Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 507 United States of America Location: michigan	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets i think an insurgent roadblock built near hideouts or caches would be awsome. but instead of wire it needs to be on fire. ( the idea is from ramiel ) i am against lots of deployables for insurgents but i think having one kind would add to insurgency. this would serve the purpose of area denial rather than extra defense.

06-02-2010, 01:36 PM	#15
Commando_Jenkins Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 124 United States of America	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets I agree the insurgent forces need some kind of deployable where they can 'Re-Route' the Blufor. But it might become to OP if they are able to place them in caves, or one way cache locations. Unless, they can be burned with thermite.

06-02-2010, 02:06 PM	#16
Jonny Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,536 United Kingdom Location: Cambridge	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets I think its one of several things that needs to be looked at again.

06-02-2010, 02:29 PM	#17
=]H[= JakCurse Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 212 United Kingdom Location: Cwmbran, Wales	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets Perhaps engineer it so that if sandbags are placed there's NO tank traps, to offset the value and make them significantly different. But yeah, great idea.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Second Battalion, Royal Welsh Regiment, British Army.

08-20-2010, 03:57 AM	#19
Maniac302 Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 104 Canada	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets I'd like to see versions of the buildable TOWs and AAs with higher sandbag walls around them, in cases where you don't need to shoot down, but want better small arms fire protection for the operator.
Maniac302 Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 104 Canada	The beatings will continue untill morale improves. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

08-20-2010, 10:16 PM	#20
Operator009 Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 184 United States of America Location: Miami, FL	Re: Alternate Deployable Assets Don't insurgents use mortars IRL? I remember US bases get mortar'ed all the time at the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links