Why headshots don't kill like they used to?

[SGT.JOKER]

Im able to still get kills with the sniper rifle now more then ever, although I havent personally used the marksmen kit. I thinks its some what unrealistic for a head shot not to be a kill....unless the guy some how managed to wear to kevlar helmets at the same time, but even thatd be a stretch

[Bellator]

I've never had an enemy survive a shot to the head from marksman or sniper weapons. But I don't seek to target the head either.

[TristanYockell]

If you shoot someone in the head with a rifle, they are more than likely stone dead. I fail to see the problem ,people get shot in the head in real life too.

I don't personaly ever waste my time only aiming for head shots and never did, I aim for whatever part I can hit "at the time".

If someone is peaking over a wall fireing at me and all I can see is his head, I want to be able to cut it off.

If someone is laying down and his foot is hanging out, his foot is fair game, just the way it is.

[[R-MOD]Saobh]

Locking this for resuggestion.

I'll resume what Fuzzhead said about this in length. With today's weapons a head/arm/chest/foot/nose shot is going to have the same effect ... you are out of battle effectiveness and most probably dead. Thus the fact that gaming wise its all the same.