AAS is Lady war?

[HAAN4]

Originally Posted by mat552

That is possibly the second most horrifying prospect I can imagine to face in PR when I can summon the courage and patience to squadlead.

It strikes me as the worst possible combination of one large flag (never knowing where my enemy is within this massive radius, essentially team deathmatch) and lots of little flags (being constricted to four or five pieces of cover that EVERYONE uses because they are the only cover to be had within the cap zone) Don't try and flank that tiny cover, because then you're out of the zone and have to start all over.

Don't forget to coordinate this assault with the armor and other squads.

the nightmare is proportinoal to the chosen Mini flags, and if they appears or not,

how say we need to shown the flags are captured? we may still make it count has a flag, whicht a nunber of mini flags you team hold, so when you kwon this is atacked you squad beguim a patrol, what look quite good like reality.

Of course it's will not be so easy to build up, but this is what might save infantry fithing when vehicle warfare and Anti vehicle war fare grows. also we can place several RANDOM mini flags to dificult the memorasies of squad leaders for where they are comming, what will also simulated the scout of the area (plus civilian evacation). we also can make a delay to the mini flag are show that has captured to show it, like 45 min, and put little couldown to take the mini flags, so when you talking a objetive you beguin to walk for one side to other, and appears a real take settlement operation.

Of course after some time Mini flags will encourage Front line combat, BUT WHAT BIG WARS ARE FOR? men at men, face to face. rifle at rifle.

besides, did you thick a entire squad waithing in the middle nothing can take a settlement?

You guys main for exemple thick that the Armor will go after the enemy flags when you team is capturing most of flags and mini flags, that's right, but what you thick Germans did in WW2?

[HAAN4]

Originally Posted by Startrekern

Now hang on just a second, he might have an interesting point here.

Is it possible to have flags-within-flags? So you could have one giant flag for the bunkers and surounding areas (500m) and then have 3-4 smaller flags for the inside of the bunkers themselves.. requiring both infantry and armor to work together to secure the area before moving on to assault a new flag.

Thats right, but of course there are alot of other balacement writed up this topic, just READ UP.

[AgentMongoose]

I just don't really get what the suggestion is. Is it just you want more stuff?

[Bellator]

Not all battles in modern war invariably become tank rumbles with a deluge of artillery. In fact, IRL entire operations can be taken with minimal artillery support: for example, the German blitzkriegs were based on minimal opening actions and little artillery screening. The Germans frequently just drove through the enemy lines, not stopping to wait for the slow artillery guns to follow them. In 2001 Afghanistan operations, IIRC the Americans relied very little on artillery, preferring to instead use lighter mortars because they thought that large guns would slow them down too much.

[myles]

what do you mean when you say light war?

and i agree with rampo from this thread it dosent seem like you know about how PR is played

[Hunt3r]

Originally Posted by myles

what do you mean when you say light war?

and i agree with rampo from this thread it dosent seem like you know about how PR is played

I think he means that there is not really intense, and I mean INTENSE, fire. Think all infantry squads duking it out over one point, with every inch bought and paid in blood.