Turn Karbala over to the MEC

[OriginalWarrior]

MEc could possibly replace USMC on archer, it could be changed into MEC vs Taliban and represent the Pakistan army fighting the taliban.

[Rudd]

Originally Posted by SkaterCrush

Could this open up a China insurgency map...?

iirc the ADF are working with this in mind, but that is far away.

[[R-DEV]DankE_SPB]

Originally Posted by Phantom2

I like the Idea but you'd have to change the name of the MEC to Iraqi Police Force and you'd have to change the guns to AK's due to that's what they normally operate with them.

do this and you lose the whole point of this suggestion, you will get another ak vs ak maps, with old equipment etc.

Iraqi Police Force

I'd also be strange to have US go against the MEC but the MEC also goes against insurgency

iraq is not exclusive country with insurgency and there is no point in creating some kind of "realistic plot" at all

[Silly_Savage]

Originally Posted by OriginalWarrior

MEc could possibly replace USMC on archer, it could be changed into MEC vs Taliban and represent the Pakistan army fighting the taliban.

It has already been stated that the U.S.M.C. is simply a placeholder until the Canadian Forces can be properly implemented on Archer.

Source

[badmojo420]

It would be nice to drive over that river with some type of amphibious vehicle after the insurgents blow up the bridges.

New vodnik maybe?

[503]

This is definitely interesting. More variation is always great. Though I don't think the MEC has any light vehicles other than that small engineer truck.

[Meza82]

i disagree with MEC vs. insurgents, or Taliban, on any map. MEC is a coalition of Middle Eastern nations who oppose the West, and is probably led by Iran and is funded/armed in part by Russia; and MEC probably funds/arms the insurgents, too. Saudia Arabia probably wouldnt be part of MEC because it is major US ally. Politcally, MEC vs. insurgents doesnt make sense. It goes against the whole "reality" of Project Reality.

i agree with OP about adding variety to PR Karbala and Ramiel (both great maps). But maybe adding the British or German forces to replace the US Army would be better. Or as mentioned earlier, make it AAS with US Army vs. MEC

[TheLean]

Originally Posted by Meza82

i disagree with MEC vs. insurgents, or Taliban, on any map. MEC is a coalition of Middle Eastern nations who oppose the West, and is probably led by Iran and is funded/armed in part by Russia; and MEC probably funds/arms the insurgents, too. Saudia Arabia probably wouldnt be part of MEC because it is major US ally. Politcally, MEC vs. insurgents doesnt make sense. It goes against the whole "reality" of Project Reality.

i agree with OP about adding variety to PR Karbala and Ramiel (both great maps). But maybe adding the British or German forces to replace the US Army would be better. Or as mentioned earlier, make it AAS with US Army vs. MEC

What about the Iraq army battling insurgents in Iraq, is that not reality?

[jayceon515]

Conventional force with scoped g3's against insurgents with AK's and without body armor?

Wouldn't that mean one shot kills for MEC?

I sure wouldn't wanna play as insurgent

[Meza82]

Originally Posted by Meza82

i disagree with MEC vs. insurgents, or Taliban, on any map. MEC is a coalition of Middle Eastern nations who oppose the West, and is probably led by Iran and is funded/armed in part by Russia; and MEC probably funds/arms the insurgents, too. Saudia Arabia probably wouldnt be part of MEC because it is major US ally. Politcally, MEC vs. insurgents doesnt make sense. It goes against the whole "reality" of Project Reality.

Originally Posted by TheLean

What about the Iraq army battling insurgents in Iraq, is that not reality?

good question. the answer is that since Iraq was invaded and basically conquered by the US and Coalition forces it is a new government, a new nation with new politcal structure.

Only after the War in Iraq with Hussein killed does it makes sense for the Iraqi army to fight the insurgents