|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 668
|
Exactly as said, a T-62 or T-55 would be a great asset there, and like the Challanger Mk. II, it spawns at the beggining of the match, and once lost, well, bye bye insurgent armor. It would be interesting to use against the Challanger, but make its balistics realistic, and keep it that it would be almost imposible for its rounds to penetrate the Challanger's armor.
Also, by adding the tank, it would give the insurgents a fair chance against the Brits. To be fair, the Big Red, SHOULD be removed. Or even better, make the insurgent tank spawn once like 5 or 6 matches, so it would not decisively change the gameplay. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 704
|
I'm failing to see the reason why we SHOULD add a tank to Al Basrah other than "it's cool" and it's a "great asset". The map is already balanced, IMO. You kill the tank and the APCs with the bomb cars/Big Red/ambushes. The Brits then have to rely on infantry which the insurgents will win in the long run.
Or, the Brits keep the armor alive and rape. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Spaz: I once had a dream where my psychology teacher was 10ft tall and ate me, then she gave birth to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 904
|
why would insurgents have a tank? ? ?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 668
|
Well, i get your point, but sometimes the Challanger is imposible to kill if manned by a competent crew. For example, unless the Ch gets close to the urban area, its very hard to kill. And about the T-55 or T-62, make it so it would get killed from a single frontal shot using the sabot. And make it so the ins tank would have go get a side, hull shot on the Ch to actually hurt it.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 668
|
Well, maybe the insurgents/some republican guard unit mannaged to hide the tank from the coalition and now, they decided to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kernow, but now mostly London.
Posts: 1,164
|
Basrah used to have an Ins tank. I don't recall it being of much use and it didn't really fit with the insugency theme either.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
PR Contributor
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,804
|
Quote:
Yeah, it didn't fit the insurgency very well, but it sure was great at downing A10s. -REad | |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 668
|
Well, in good hands it would be great at killing Brit armor, while still having to do a lot of maneuvring to avoid the Ch2, and/or to get a good side shot at him(like a 90 degree projectile incidence angle).
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
there was a thread suggesting this exact same thing about a month ago
|
|
known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
' To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| add, basrah, insurgent, tank |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|