Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! - Page 2

DannyIMK · 11-26-2009, 07:09 AM

im sure all those fighters are capable of ground attack in real life.
F16 is multirole fighter.
and the fighter bombs aren't so strong anyway.

there is no point in have Air Superiority Fighters for both teams with no ground attack. why would a team deploy a Air Superiority jet to take down another harmless(no bombs) jet

CAS_117 · 11-27-2009, 12:34 AM

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament.html

[R-DEV]Ninja2dan · 11-27-2009, 02:08 AM

Not quite sure the point of that image in relation to the topic. That is an F-16C based out of Kunsan AB, dropping what appears to be the GBU-31.

And I'm sorry, but I just can't follow this topic. I mean no offense to anyone who doesn't speak English as their primary language, but I'm really not understanding the point of this discussion or the basis to any of the arguments.

CAS_117 · 11-27-2009, 06:07 AM

Fighters can carry bombs, and I put a source there.

[R-COM]HangMan · 11-27-2009, 07:25 AM

I think this guy wants jets to no longer have bombs?? Man i am really confused. Jets still need the bombs, they have a hard enough time as it is why cripple them more.

Kim Jong ill · 11-27-2009, 08:59 AM

It's pretty simple, the OP doesn't understand the concept of a multirole fighter and the thread should be locked and canned.

mat552 · 11-27-2009, 09:24 AM

These are not my viewpoints

He is suggesting that Fighter aircraft in PR (F16, MiG29, Eurofighter, J10) should NOT be equipped with any air to ground weapons on the basis that in reality these aircraft are only used for air superiority and do not have jobs that overlap with the Close Support Aircraft like the A10 and Su25.

The second suggestion is that there should be more flares equipped (only to) the A10 and Su25.

The third suggestion is relating to the hope that while the Su-30 was made as an "air-dominance" aircraft, it will be equipped as a multirole plane in PR. There is an expression of disbelief at the number of AA weapons on it, citing the 12 attachment pylons as proof that the aircraft should carry more AA weapons. He also desires for it to have 2 bombs, and 2 air to ground guided missiles. (The Su-30 is the Chinese two seater currently)

11-26-2009, 07:09 AM	#11
DannyIMK Join Date: Jan 2008 Israel Posts: 222	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! im sure all those fighters are capable of ground attack in real life. F16 is multirole fighter. and the fighter bombs aren't so strong anyway. there is no point in have Air Superiority Fighters for both teams with no ground attack. why would a team deploy a Air Superiority jet to take down another harmless(no bombs) jet
DannyIMK Join Date: Jan 2008 Israel Posts: 222

11-27-2009, 12:34 AM	#12
CAS_117 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Canada Location: Daytona Beach Florida Posts: 1,558	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! http://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament.html

11-27-2009, 02:08 AM	#13
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan PR Military Adviser Join Date: Oct 2007 United States of America Location: Oregon Posts: 1,785	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! Not quite sure the point of that image in relation to the topic. That is an F-16C based out of Kunsan AB, dropping what appears to be the GBU-31. And I'm sorry, but I just can't follow this topic. I mean no offense to anyone who doesn't speak English as their primary language, but I'm really not understanding the point of this discussion or the basis to any of the arguments.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-27-2009, 06:07 AM	#14
CAS_117 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Canada Location: Daytona Beach Florida Posts: 1,558	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! Fighters can carry bombs, and I put a source there.

11-27-2009, 07:25 AM	#15
[R-COM]HangMan NZDF Faction Lead Join Date: Jun 2009 New zealand Location: Auckland Posts: 1,712	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! I think this guy wants jets to no longer have bombs?? Man i am really confused. Jets still need the bombs, they have a hard enough time as it is why cripple them more.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Community Faction Team - "Getting Sht Done..."*

11-27-2009, 08:59 AM	#16
Kim Jong ill Join Date: Jun 2009 Australia Location: Adelaide Posts: 165	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! It's pretty simple, the OP doesn't understand the concept of a multirole fighter and the thread should be locked and canned.

11-27-2009, 09:24 AM	#17
mat552 Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 855	Re: Fighters no have bombs!Attack jets have more flares! These are not my viewpoints He is suggesting that Fighter aircraft in PR (F16, MiG29, Eurofighter, J10) should NOT be equipped with any air to ground weapons on the basis that in reality these aircraft are only used for air superiority and do not have jobs that overlap with the Close Support Aircraft like the A10 and Su25. The second suggestion is that there should be more flares equipped (only to) the A10 and Su25. The third suggestion is relating to the hope that while the Su-30 was made as an "air-dominance" aircraft, it will be equipped as a multirole plane in PR. There is an expression of disbelief at the number of AA weapons on it, citing the 12 attachment pylons as proof that the aircraft should carry more AA weapons. He also desires for it to have 2 bombs, and 2 air to ground guided missiles. (The Su-30 is the Chinese two seater currently)
mat552 Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 855	Players might be hardcoded, but that sure doesn't seem to stop anybody from trying.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links