|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,099
|
In old Basrah the VCB had a temporary spawn at the beginning of the round. With the changes to Insurgency that have happened since then (including the release of Fallujah and Korengal) and the resulting increase in base camping at the mains has led me to believe a secondary, non asset spawn would be a good idea.
Using current maps it would work like so: Korengal Current main would have the dome increased in size. Outpost (on the hill in the middle of the map) would have a permanent spawn but no assets at all, simply a way for infantry to get into battle. The insurgents would have to hold the fort completely to disable of the spawn point (say 4+ insurgents within or on top of the walls themselves) and the spawn point would stay for 5 minutes after they were cleared off. Basrah Main is fine, but treat the VCB just like the main and add an additional base in the SW portion of the city or by the Mansion in the SW corner with a few assets (since the bridges can be blown to trap them in) and a smaller dome of death. Remove the cache spawn points there of course. Ramiel Use the hesco modeled fort in the south central part of the city (with the military tents) as the infantry spawn that can be overrun. What this would add is infantry access to the cities themselves, since the BluFor is already having difficulty with making a permanent presence in the cities. note: I primarily play insurgents and prefer to do so. I think this change would improve the combat interaction on both sides. |
|
My
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. AnimalMother's To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tas
Posts: 602
|
I think its good the way it is, if you want to use the forts the mapper has provided then you have to place the fire base and then defended it yourself.
|
|
Make nukes, Not war
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. chuckMFd on 0.9- Can we trade back Assault on Mestia for Qinling? [R-DEV]masaq - It's rather difficult to "apprehend" a Tu-95... you try persuading a 200-ton aircraft to land somewhere it doesn't want to, when it has enough fuel to get home and it knows you can't/won't shoot it down |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Snowy Northeast
Posts: 7,406
|
I agree, it's not challenging to set up an outpost and get a spawn, along with an MG and barriers. With a little teamwork the current system works great. The problem is lack of teamwork.
|
|
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| blufor, insurgency, map, maps, multiple, spawns |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|