Adding transport helos to Fools Road and Kozelsk

[Jedimushroom]

I agree, scenario realism can go away, we need some interesting combat mechanics over here!

[Kruder]

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]dbzao

Yea, because everything else you said in my quote is true...

Maybe u should try it with a clearer language or provide me some links about what you are trying to tell (pls note that i cant talk the way u talk to me,or i'll get infraction points/ban)

[[R-CON]ReadMenace]

Originally Posted by Kruder

Maybe u should try it with a clearer language or provide me some links about what you are trying to tell (pls note that i cant talk the way u talk to me,or i'll get infraction points/ban)

See. Were they slated for demolition I wouldn't have slaved away on the Russian kit geometries -- knowledge their existence has been public since August 3rd.

On Topic:
Transport choppers -- maybe.. An attack or hybrid of the two would make either maps very cramped.

-REad

[Rudd]

Originally Posted by [R-COM]Cheditor

A helicopter on fools or kozelesk would kill the chechens outright. The way the chechans win is through hit and run attacks and ambushes, but if the russians can just leapfrog any possible defence the chechens are mounting, then russians will just always win.

trees block vision - requires teamwork between ground and air (i.e. fun)

Chech have plenty of places to hide

Russians lose their tanks to balance, maybe even an APC and their BRDMs.

Maybe u should try it with a clearer language or provide me some links about what you are trying to tell (pls note that i cant talk the way u talk to me,or i'll get infraction points/ban)

seriously lol

[mat552]

Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd

Russians lose their tanks to balance, maybe even an APC and their BRDMs.

Considering the terrain and how few places any chopper bigger than a littlebird can actually land, let's not be hasty about stripping a team of their primary assets. Helicopters are always secondary assets on a non amphibious assault map.

Personally, I don't think helicopters would add anything to Fools Road (might even subtract from it), and the benefit to Kozelsk would be questionable at best.

I do think the Russians need some Airborne assets, but if they get shoehorned into where they don't belong, we'll quickly tire of them and not want to see them anymore.

[Rudd]

I do think the Russians need some Airborne assets, but if they get shoehorned into where they don't belong, we'll quickly tire of them and not want to see them anymore.

thing is, the 32 layers of both maps aren't being used afaik.

Make the layer, let the servers decide?

[[R-DEV]dbzao]

Originally Posted by Kruder

Maybe u should try it with a clearer language or provide me some links about what you are trying to tell (pls note that i cant talk the way u talk to me,or i'll get infraction points/ban)

I don't like people making accusations that the dev team doesn't "care" about a certain faction, that it won't add anything for it, that it prefers one over other, blah blah blah.

If somebody really thinks that's the case, after all these releases, they are clearly blind or stupid.

There's a bunch of material already posted about Russians and other opfor factions, and several other in the works.

[Hunt3r]

I'd be in favor of a single Havoc or Mi-24. The forest means you have to rely on markers and your commander to give you proper intel.

Oh, and the Chechens happen to have AA, so going in without markers and extremely good intel on AA in the area is like running into a bonfire.

[jbgeezer]

Im in BIG favor of helos on this maps.

YouTube Video

Speaks for itself

[WilsonPL]

i dont understand why only marines/usarmy have transport choppers in pr...