|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,175
Location: Himitsu!
|
As we see a lot ingame is massive abuse of the Crewman kit.
i Would like to see the Crewmen with a G3A4 Top onethis is a more equal to the US/GB Crewmen as they pretty much use a standard rifle, plus the G3A4 has a collapsible buttstock which adds more realism to it, plus it might end the abuse of the 1337 Crewmen. As far as i know the Norwegians have a AG-3F1 which is very similar to the G3A4. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by Naruto-kun; 09-16-2009 at 06:04 PM..
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 306
|
meh. I'm betting it would be roughly the size of a m4 collapsed so i'm not gunna argue. Mec are really the only guys who have a smg for crewmen.
|
|
if you miss him... try, try again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,673
Location: Sao Paulo
|
yea, just change the bloody weapons for crewmans!
Make a burst fire or single fire! and DONE! |
|
Guys, when a new player comes, just answer his question and go on your merry way, instead of going berserk! It's THAT simple!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,281
Location: norfolk
|
even with a collapsible stock i doubt any crewman would want that in his vehicle.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,673
Location: Sao Paulo
|
|
|
Guys, when a new player comes, just answer his question and go on your merry way, instead of going berserk! It's THAT simple!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
the model is already done
|
|
http://maxfragg.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() |
^ I agree with the g3A4, and Max is right.
He also has a great sig :P |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "We live for the one! We die for the one!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
NZDF Faction Lead
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,725
Location: Auckland
|
The crewman kit at the moment is extremely fun but a bit too awesome. G3A4 is a cool looking gun. +1 for this suggestion..
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Community Faction Team - "Getting Sh*t Done..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,022
Location: Nottingham <3
|
Yeah I like this (though it will be an end of awesome times when your APC is down, and you and your gunner and trapped behind it's brunt out hulk holding off hordes of US marines.... *sniff*)
If I'm brutally honest I think all crewmen should just get Pistols like Pilots did. I've been inside a Scimitar several times and a challenger once (driving position at least) and there would be no where I would want to keep an assault rifle - it'd just get in the way. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,677
Location: Manchester
|
The problem is the G3 is a big, chunky gun. On paper the difference between a collapsed M4 (757mm long) and a collapsed G3A4 (800mm) isn't that big, but the G3 is not a dainty, easily handlable rifle. Even the German army never issued tank crews with G3 variants (they used to get the MP2). The MP5 is a sensible choice for them.
Big battle rifles, or even full sized assault rifles, are extremely rare in the hands of tank crewmen. Historically they carried pistols or submachine guns and more recently carbines. As the MEC are employing a big battle rifle, it would be accurate to give thier crewmen and such either a 9mm SMG or handgun. If you look back at gun crews, engineers, etc in armies using 7.62x51mm rifles you'll almost always see a Sterling, grease gun, uzi or some other SMG strapped to thier backs. |
|
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Your powerful ... forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children. Now of course it's not true, but the world only believes what the media tells them to believe." - Kane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| crewman, mec, suggestion |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|