|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
Quote:
________________________________________________ In regards to the 'drawbacks' of the firebases, let me reiterate my idea with a little more detail; made possible by Dragosh's picture! (1) Main firebase would be replaced by more-or-less something like Dragosh's picture. It again simulates the radio-on-a-table idea, but will fit much better in an outdoor setting. (2) A new, secondary firebase would consist of the bare-minimum radio-table. This will be meant to be used inside a building, meaning that some of the defense structures would be unnecessary to be used since the building itself provides protection. The main firebase would stay exactly the same, only with the new model, allowing it to be a bit less obtrusive. The secondary firebase would, again, be a radio on a table, and would be meant to be used indoors. Because of this, it could be made so that this has certain drawbacks in comparison to the full firebase, so that people do not attempt to hide this small firebase in the middle of nowhere. Note that all of the following in the list are simply ideas, and could be put in or ignored where fit to make it feel the way it should. Differences to normal firebase: 1. To simulate less need to haul materials, since the 'base' is simplified to accomodate the building, this could be placed slightly farther away from supply crates. 1a. Alternatively, it could be placed using only one supply crate. 2. No requirement to be shoveled; obviously, this is a very simple setup and should only need to be set up. Spawning could be delayed for 30 seconds to simulate getting the radio working. 3. Can be destroyed easier (gunfire, explosives, knife, incendiary; since it doesn't need a 'build' phase, it could be destroyed by an incendiary without the need to be 'knifed' first) 4. Since the building provides it's own protection, foxhole numbers can be reduced. HMG numbers should remain the same, as the building doesn't have it's own defensive weaponry, though it does provide shelter. Razorwire may or may not be reduced as well, due to the fact that the wire could be useful to block off entrances in certain areas. Similarities: 1. Follows all game rules regarding FOBs including the amount available to be placed, distance from other firebase, etc. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
I'm not sure about you guys but i think the present fb skin is just perfect the way it is
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cerkno
Posts: 3,127
|
Yeah, but i see people abusing this system...place fob and move on...or place a fob somewhere it cannot be seen...
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Orgies beat masturbation hands down. - Staker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
Firebases that are defended with structures will be just as easy to spot now, and base structures like the radio-table will stick out pretty well in any urban/desert/forest environment (Table is desert colored, radio is green; either way, something will be sticking out). | |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,866
|
this is a great idea, i dont like the concept of limiting the builds you can have around it though, although it is a simpler asset to build, IRL that building will be reinforced on the outside and inside. limiting the amount of objects you can build around it would be stupid.
also instead of no shovel and just place, how about place, shovel 3 or 4 times to simulate unfolding the table and laying out the radio/maps etc. that way although its simpler to build it still requires an extra man to put it up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
|
How about. only an SL can deploy it but only the engineer wrench can set it up. BAM!!! the engineer is useful again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 98
|
I think you should still allow foxholes to be built around this sort of Fire Base. As the fox holes in game represent the players digging in (and unfortunately they cannot dig below the surface) And maybe a limited amount of wire (say two pieces only)
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
|
I'd say limiting the objects around the firebase is quite useless, no offence. Why make two types of firebases at first place? Isn't one where you can optionally add something or leave without enough?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| firebase, making, maller, radio, smaller |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|